Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeshima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mochizuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeshima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mochizuki, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*SAFFLOWER OIL
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Original Communications

Influence of Adding Fish Oil to Parenteral Nutrition on Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue

Yoshinori Maeshima, MD*, Kazuhiko Fukatsu, MD, PhD{dagger}, Tomoyuki Moriya, MD{ddagger}, Fumie Ikezawa, MD{dagger}, Chikara Ueno, MD*, Daizoh Saitoh, MD, PhD{dagger} and Hidetaka Mochizuki, MD, PhD*

From the * Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan; {dagger} Division of Basic Traumatology, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Saitama, Japan; and the {ddagger} Department of Surgery, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Correspondence: Kazuhiko Fukatsu, MD, PhD, Division of Basic Traumatology, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan 359-8513. Electronic mail may be sent to fukatsu{at}ndmc.ac.jp.

Background: Lack of enteral nutrition reduces gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) mass and function, a mechanism underlying the increased morbidity of infectious complications in severely injured or critically ill patients. Strategies to restore parenteral nutrition (PN)–induced changes of GALT mass and function have been pursued. However, the influences of adding fish oil to PN on gut immunity remain to be clarified. Methods: Male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice (n = 50) were randomized to 4 groups: ad libitum chow (chow), fat free PN (fat (–)-PN), PN + fish oil (FO-PN), and PN + safflower oil (SO-PN). The PN groups were given isocaloric and isonitrogenous PN solutions. The FO- and SO-PN groups received 20% of total calories from fat emulsions. After 5 days of feeding, lymphocytes from Peyer's patches (PPs), the intraepithelial space (IE), and the lamina propria (LP) of the entire small intestine were isolated. GALT lymphocyte numbers and phenotypes (CD4+, CD8+, {alpha}βTCR+, {gamma}{delta}TCR+, B220+ cells) were determined. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels of small intestinal washings were also measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Another set of mice (n = 24) was used to determine plasma fatty acid compositions after feeding. Results: Lymphocyte numbers from PPs and the LP and intestinal IgA levels were significantly lower in the PN groups than in the chow group, with no significant differences between any 2 PN groups. The FO- and SO-PN groups showed moderate recovery of IE cell numbers compared with the fat (–)-PN group. {Omega}-3 and {omega}-6 fatty acid levels were increased with fish and safflower oil additions, respectively, compared with the fat (–)-PN group. Conclusions: Adding fish oil to PN does not exacerbate PN-induced GALT changes but rather partially reverses these changes, with increased plasma {omega}-3 fatty acid levels.

Recent advancements in immunology have led to a better understanding of the role of nutrition in host responses to various surgical insults. Nutrition is now recognized to modulate and improve immune responses, as well as to provide energy and nitrogen.1 Modern nutrition therapy includes early enteral nutrition and immune-enhancing diets. Clinical benefits of these nutrition interventions have been demonstrated in randomized controlled studies.24

{Omega}-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are important constituents of many immune-enhancing diets available for clinical use.5 While {omega}-6 PUFAs have been demonstrated to enhance the inflammatory response and suppress host immunity through production of potent inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandin (PG)-2 and leukotriene (LT)-4 series eicosanoids, dietary supplementation of {omega}-3 PUFAs reportedly alters the cell membrane composition, with decreased production of these eicosanoids but increased production of the less inflammatory and more immunocompetent PG-3 and LT-5 series.6,7 Thus, unlike other immunonutrients, such as arginine, glutamine, and nucleotides, {omega}-3 PUFAs do not stimulate the immune system. Instead, {omega}-3 PUFAs aid the immune system by competing with arachidonic acid for cyclo-oxygenase metabolism at the cell membrane.6,7

Though enteral formulas containing immunonutrients are considered to have strong effects on host immunity, some patients do not benefit from enteral nutrition due to bowel obstruction, splanchnic hypoperfusion, or gastrointestinal (GI) tract bleeding. To provide immunonutrients to these critically ill and severely injured patients, parenteral immunonutrition formulas have been developed. New parenteral formulas, such as alanyl-glutamine dipeptide solution and {omega}-3 PUFA emulsions, are still not clinically available in Japan or the United States. However, clinical data from the use of these formulas (ie, effects on host response) have already been demonstrated in some European and other countries.811

To date, no marked disadvantages of {omega}-3 PUFA-rich parenteral nutrition (PN) have been reported in terms of gut immunity. To the contrary, enteral administration of {omega}-3 PUFAs with glutamine and fructose diphosphate was shown to increase the mucosal cell proliferative index and to decrease the apoptotic index in a small bowel graft model.12 However, it is possible that {omega}-3 PUFA-supplemented parenteral solutions exacerbate PN-induced gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) atrophy and dysfunction, in the absence of other nutrients with trophic effects on the mucosa and lymphoid tissue. {Omega}-3 PUFAs are by themselves known to induce marked apoptosis and to reduce proliferation of immune cells and gut mucosal cells.1316 Dietary {omega}-3 PUFAs induced higher apoptosis of splenocytes by increasing the generation of lipid peroxides and elevating Fas-L expression along with decreasing Bcl-2 expression when these cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-Fas antibody.13 When human blood lymphocytes were stimulated in vitro with polyclonal antigens, addition of {omega}-3 fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid) to the medium inhibited their proliferation.14 Phytohemagglutinin-induced proliferation of mononuclear cells was suppressed by 70% after {omega}-3 fatty acid supplementation of a normal diet.15 Moreover, incorporation of eicosapentaenoic acid into colonic epithelial cell lipids was reported to increase apoptosis.16

Therefore, we designed this study to examine the influences of adding {omega}-3 and {omega}-6 PUFAs to PN on GALT mass and function in a murine model. We used fish oil and safflower oil emulsions as significant sources of {omega}-3 fatty and {omega}-6 fatty acids, respectively. We randomized mice to fat-free PN, PN + safflower oil, PN + fish oil, and chow groups. The ad libitum chow group served as well-nourished controls receiving a normal diet and underwent the same surgical procedure as did the PN groups.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 
Animals
Specific, pathogen-free, 6- to 7-week-old, male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR; Nippon SLC, Hamamatsu, Japan) mice were housed under controlled temperature (24°C) and humidity (60%) conditions with a 12-hour:12-hour light:dark cycle. Mice were fed standard chow (CE7; Clea Japan, Tokyo, Japan) containing protein, fat, carbohydrate, cellulose, minerals, and a vitamin mix with water ad libitum for 1 week before protocol entry. All studies were approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of the National Defense Medical College.

Surgical Procedure
Seventy-four mice were given general anesthesia (ketamine hydrochloride 100 mg/kg and xylazine 10 mg/kg mixture) and randomized into 4 groups: ad libitum chow (chow: n = 18), fat-free PN (fat (–)-PN: n = 15), PN + fish oil (FO-PN: n = 20), or PN + safflower oil (SO-PN: n = 21). All mice underwent implantation of silicon rubber catheters (Imamura Co, Tokyo, Japan; 0.014-inch inner diameter/0.026-inch outer diameter) into the right jugular vein. A silicon rubber catheter was inserted into the vena cava via the right internal jugular. The proximal end of the catheter was tunneled subcutaneously over the spine and exited the tail at its midpoint. The mice were placed in metal metabolism cages and partially immobilized by tail restraint to protect the catheter during infusion. This technique is an acceptable method of nutrition support that does not induce physical or biochemical stress.17 Catheterized mice were immediately connected to an infusion pump (TE-331; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan).

Experimental Design and Nutrition Support
Catheterized mice were given a 0.9% NaCl solution, 4.8 mL/d, and allowed ad libitum access to chow (CE-7) and water for 48 hours to promote recovery from surgical stress (Figure 1). The chow control group received chow ad libitum and water, with continuous infusion of 0.9% NaCl saline, 4.8 mL/d, via a jugular vein catheter. The PN groups were given isocaloric and isonitrogenous standard PN solutions with or without fat emulsion. These PN solutions provided 1230 kcal/L, with a nonprotein calorie/nitrogen ratio of 208:1 kcal/g nitrogen (Table I). The PN solutions were supplemented with micronutrients (Elemenmic; Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan) and multivitamins (M.V.I-SS, SS-seiyaku Co, Tokyo, Japan). The SO- and FO-PN groups received 20% of total calories from fat emulsions. Part of the carbohydrate in the fat (–)-PN solution was replaced by safflower oil or fish oil, without changing the amino acid composition. The fish oil emulsion (Omegaven; Fresenius-Kabi, Bad Homberg, Germany) contained 10% fish oil (eicosapentaenoic acid 12.5–28.2, docosahexaenoic acid 14.4–30.9 g/L of fat emulsion). The safflower oil emulsion contained 10% safflower oil (linoleic acid 73.5 g/L of fat emulsion). The PN groups were advanced from 9.6 mL/d of PN solution to a target rate of 16.8 mL/d (20.7 kcal/d) by the third day of feeding (day 1, 0.4 mL/h; day 2, 0.5 mL/h; days 3–5, 0.7 mL/h) because a graded infusion period was demonstrated to be necessary to allow the mice to adapt to the glucose and fluid load.18 The target rate for the PN solution was determined according to our previous data from ad libitum chow–fed mice. The chow mice consumed approximately 6–6.5 g of chow (20.4–22.1 kcal) per day in this setting.


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Feeding protocol. Daily food intakes for days 1–7 (chow, n = 12; fat (–)-PN, n = 9; FO-PN, n = 14; SO-PN, n = 15) are shown. The chow group received a saline infusion with free access to chow and water throughout the feeding period. After day 2, the parenteral (fat (–)-PN, FO-PN, and SO-PN) groups were advanced from 9.6 mL/d PN solution to a target rate of 16.8 mL/d (20.7 kcal/d) by the third day of feeding (day 3, 0.4 mL/h; day 4, 0.5 mL/h; days 5–7, 0.7 mL/h). FO, fish oil emulsion; GALT, gut-associated lymphoid tissue; PN, parenteral nutrition; SO, safflower oil emulsion.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table I Dietary compositions

 

Experiment 1: GALT Mass and Function
Fifty mice (chow: n = 12; fat (–)-PN: n = 9; FO-PN: n = 14; SO-PN: n = 15) were used for GALT lymphocyte isolation and measurement of small intestinal immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels.

GALT isolation. Lymphocytes were isolated from GALT using a modification of the method described by Li et al.19 Peyer's patches (PPs) were examined as an inductive tissue for mucosal immunity. Lymphocytes of the intraepithelial (IE) space and lamina propria (LP) were chosen as gut mucosal immunity effector sites.

PPs. PPs were excised from the serosal side of the intestine and then teased apart. The fragments were treated with collagenase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 40 U/mL) in RPMI1640 for 60 minutes at 37°C, with constant shaking. After collagenase digestion, the cell suspensions were passed through nylon filters.

IE and LP cells. After PP excision, the intestine was turned inside out and cut into 4 segments. The segments were incubated with RPMI1640 containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% glutamine, and a 1% antibiotic mixture (penicillin and streptomycin; GIBCO, Auckland, New Zealand), for 45 minutes at 37°C in a water shaker (150 rpm). Supernatants containing released sloughed epithelial cells and IE lymphocytes were stored on ice. The remaining tissue pieces were incubated 3 times, 45 minutes each time, with RPMI1640 containing collagenase (Sigma; 40 U/mL), 5% FBS, glutamine, and an antibiotic mixture at 37°C at 150 rpm in a water shaker. Supernatants containing LP cells from each incubation were pooled on ice. Supernatants were filtered through a glass wool column. Suspensions were centrifuged, the pellets were resuspended in 40% Percoll (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), and the cell suspensions were overlaid on 75% Percoll. After centrifugation for 20 minutes at 600 g at 25°C, viable lymphocytes were recovered and washed in RPMI1640. The lymphocytes were resuspended in RPMI1640 with 5% FBS, 1% glutamine, and the 1% antibiotic mixture and then counted. This procedure yields a cell population that is 95%–100% viable by trypan blue exclusion.

Flow cytometry. Lymphocytes (1 x 105) isolated from PPs, the IE space, and the LP were suspended in 50 µL HBSS containing fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) antimouse {gamma}{delta}TCR (clone GL3; Caltag, Burlingame, CA) and phycoerythrin (PE) conjugated antimouse βTCR (clone H57–597; Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) to identify {gamma}{delta}TCR+ T cells and {alpha}βTCR+ T cells, respectively, or PE-anti-CD4 (clone CT-CD4; Caltag) and FITC-anti-CD8{alpha} (clone CT-CD8a; Caltag) to identify the 2 T-cell subsets or FITC-anti-CD45R (B220; clone RA3–6B2; Caltag) to identify B cells. All antibodies were diluted to 1 µg/mL in HBSS containing 1% FBS. Incubations were carried out for 30 minutes on ice. After staining, the cells were washed twice in HBSS/1% FBS and then fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on an Epics XL (Coulter, Hileah, IL).

IgA quantification. Immunoglobulin A was measured in intestinal washings in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a polyclonal goat anti-mouse IgA (Sigma) to coat the plate, a purified mouse IgA (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) as the standard, and a horseradish peroxidase– conjugated goat-antimouse IgA (Sigma).

Experiment 2: Plasma Fatty Acid Composition
Twenty-four mice (n = 6 in each group) were used for plasma fatty acid composition measurement. After 5 days of feeding, blood was obtained by cardiac puncture under anesthesia. Total lipids from 0.1 mL of plasma were extracted with chloroform:methanol (2:1, vol/vol) containing 50 mg/L 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol.20 The chloroform extract was concentrated by evaporation under nitrogen. For esterification, the lipids were boiled under reflux conditions for 7 minutes with 0.46 mL of 0.5 M methanolic sodium hydroxide solution, 0.6 mL of 14% methanolic boron trifluoride was added, and the mixture was boiled under reflux conditions for another 30 minutes. The reaction mixture was extracted with 0.35 mL of isooctane and 2 mL of saturated sodium chloride solution. The fatty acid composition of the upper isooctane layer was analyzed by gas chromatography.21,22

Statistical analysis. Results are presented as mean ± SE. Statistical significance was determined using a 1-way ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Fisher's protected least significant difference test. A value of p < .05 was considered to represent a statistically significant difference.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Numbers of GALT lymphocytes. Values are mean ± SE. *p < .05 vs chow. FO, fish oil emulsion; PN, parenteral nutrition; SO, safflower oil emulsion.

 

    RESULTS
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 
Experiment 1
Body weight change. At the beginning of the experiment, there were no significant differences in body weight among the groups (Table II). After feeding, the fat (–)-PN group gained significantly less weight than the other 3 groups. There were no significant differences in weight gain among the chow, FO-, and SO-PN groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table II Initial body weight and weight gain

 

Total cell yields from GALT. PP lymphocyte numbers were significantly lower in the fat (–)-, FO-, and SO-PN groups than in the chow group (Figure 2). The FO- and SO-PN groups did not show marked changes compared with the fat (–)-PN group.

The IE lymphocyte numbers were significantly lower in the fat (–)-PN than in the chow group. Those of the FO- and SO-PN groups were midway between those of the chow and fat (–)-PN groups.

With regard to the LP, lymphocyte numbers were significantly lower in the fat (–)-, FO-, and SO-PN groups than in the chow group. LP lymphocyte numbers were similar in the fat (–)-, FO-, and SO-PN groups, with no significant differences among the 3 PN groups.

Absolute numbers of {alpha}βTCR+, {gamma}{delta}TCR+, CD4+, CD8+, and B220+ cells in GALT. Absolute numbers of {alpha}βTCR+, CD4+, and B220+ cells in PPs, {alpha}βTCR+, {gamma}{delta}TCR+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells in IE spaces and {gamma}{delta}TCR+ cells in the LP were significantly lower in the fat (–)-, {omega}3-, and {omega}6-PN groups than in the chow group, without significant differences among the fat (–)-, FO-, and SO-PN groups (Table III).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table III Absolute numbers of lymphocytes with each phenotype

 

The fat (–)- and FO-PN groups showed significantly lower PP {gamma}{delta}TCR+ and IE B220+, as well as LP {alpha}βTCR+ and CD8+, cell numbers than the chow group.

The PP CD8+ cell numbers were significantly lower in the fat (–)-PN than in the chow group, whereas the FO- and SO-PN groups did not show significant reductions compared with the chow group.

Intestinal IgA levels. Intestinal IgA levels in the chow group were significantly higher than those in the fat (–)-, FO-, and SO-PN groups, whereas there were no significant differences among the 3 PN groups (Figure 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Intestinal IgA levels. Values are mean ± SE. *p < .05 vs chow. FO, fish oil emulsion; PN, parenteral nutrition; SO, safflower oil emulsion.

 
Experiment 2
Plasma {omega}-3 fatty acid levels were significantly higher in the FO-PN than in the other groups. The fat (–)- and SO-PN groups had significantly lower {omega}-3 fatty acid levels than the chow group (Figure 4A). The chow and SO-PN groups both had significantly higher {omega}-6 fatty acid levels than the fat (–)- and FO-PN groups (Figure 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. A, Plasma {omega}-3 fatty acid levels. B, Plasma {omega}-6 fatty acid levels. Values are mean ± SE. *p < .05 vs chow; {dagger}p < .05 vs FO-PN. FO, fish oil emulsion; PN, parenteral nutrition; SO, safflower oil emulsion.

 


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 
In the present study, the fat-free PN group had significantly lower PP, IE, and LP lymphocyte numbers and intestinal IgA levels than the chow group, which is consistent with previous reports by the Kudsk group.23,24 Addition of fish or safflower oil had minimal effects on GALT cell numbers, producing partial recovery of IE lymphocyte numbers. Fish oil supplementation had no detrimental effects on gut immunity, in comparison to the fat-free PN group.

Naïve lymphocytes migrate from the bloodstream across PP high endothelial venules and are sensitized to antigens. Sensitized lymphocytes move to mesenteric lymph nodes, travel via the thoracic duct and home to intestinal (IE space and LP) or extraintestinal mucosal sites.25,26 GALT is thus considered to be a center of systemic mucosal immunity. Experimental and clinical research has linked GALT mass atrophy and dysfunction during PN to increased susceptibility to infectious complications.19,23,2630 In these studies, animals were fed fat-free or {omega}-6 PUFA-supplemented PN solutions.23,2629 Because fat amounts and compositions of fat may affect the host inflammatory response, with the possible influence of nutrition route on host immunity being unclear, fat-free PN solutions have frequently been administered in animal studies. Because the main component of fat emulsions used in clinical settings has been {omega}-6 PUFA, PN with {omega}-6 PUFAs was the most widely studied composition in animal models. To our knowledge, effects of parenteral {omega}-3 PUFAs on GALT have not previously been examined. Because {omega}-3 PUFA parenteral solutions may be given to patients with the expectation of normalizing host immunity, we considered it to be important to determine whether these solutions have any beneficial or detrimental effects on GALT. In the present study, we used fish and safflower oil as significant sources of {omega}3- and {omega}6-fatty acids, respectively.

According to our findings, adding fish oil to PN does not accelerate PN-induced GALT changes, nor does it change the phenotypic pattern of GALT lymphocytes. On the contrary, both fish and safflower oil appeared to partially reverse PN-induced IE cell loss. The precise mechanisms underlying these phenomena are not clear from the present results, because we did not examine either apoptosis or proliferation of GALT lymphocytes. Moreover, whether adding fat changed prostanoid production in GALT in the present setting was not evaluated. However, plasma fatty acid compositions changed markedly with fish oil addition in experiment 2, suggesting the PUFA dose given to mice in the present study are apparently sufficient to produce immunomodulatory effects in vivo.

Fat-free PN has been demonstrated to decrease gut IgA-stimulating cytokine levels while not changing gut IgA-inhibiting cytokine levels, which is presumably an important mechanism underlying the low secretory IgA levels observed in the absence of enteral nutrition.26,31 Dietary {omega}-3 PUFAs reportedly increase breast milk IgA levels in association with enhanced levels of IgA-stimulating cytokines (IL-10 and IL-6).32 A synthetic {omega}-3 PUFA was demonstrated to inhibit T lymphocyte production of the IgA-inhibiting cytokines TNFβ and IFN{gamma}.33 Thus, in terms of the maintenance of secretory IgA levels, one might have expected the PN + fish oil group to have shown beneficial effects, compared with the PN + safflower oil and fat-free PN groups. However, there were no significant differences in small intestinal IgA levels between any 2 of the PN-fed groups in the current study. It is possible that adding fat does not exert direct effects on the gut cytokine milieu in this setting.

Various mechanisms associated with PN can impair gut immunity. Lack of a direct nutrition supply from the gut lumen to the mucosa and absence of glutamine, an important energy substrate for both immune and gut epithelial cells, in PN solution, decreased neuropeptide release and increased apoptosis of GALT lymphocytes. These changes, together with alterations in the lymphocyte homing system and gut cytokine milieu, may all contribute to impaired gut immunity during PN.24,34 The present study suggests that fat administration does not have strong effects on GALT mass or function in uninjured patients during the short period of PN. Nevertheless, we need to determine whether {omega}-3 and {omega}-6 PUFA addition to PN affects GALT in the settings of various insults. Of course, long-term administration of fat-free PN may have deleterious effects on GALT even in uninjured states because fat is an essential cell membrane component and a precursor of several important mediators.

In the present study, we did not include animals receiving both fish and safflower oil. Healthy subjects generally ingest various types of fat, at various ratios of {omega}-3 and {omega}-6 PUFAs, from foods. There might be an optimal {omega}-3/{omega}-6 PUFA rate for preservation of GALT. In a future study, we plan to assess this possibility. We should also keep in mind that fish oil includes other components that might have affected the results and that the profile of fish oil differs significantly from that of flax seed oil, another significant source of {omega}-3 fatty acids. Therefore, we cannot conclude that all {omega}-3 fatty acids have the same effects on GALT as those demonstrated in the present study.


    SUMMARY
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 
Although dietary {omega}-3 PUFAs have been demonstrated to increase apoptosis and decrease proliferation of immune cells and gut mucosal cells, we confirmed that adding fish oil to PN at 20% of total calories does not further exacerbate PN-induced GALT atrophy or dysfunction. Clinicians may be able to prescribe PN solutions with fish oil without concern as to possible detrimental effects on GALT. However, unlike glutamine, infusion of a fish oil emulsion has no marked beneficial impact on GALT maintenance during PN. The most appropriate immunonutrients for PN should be tailored to the conditions of individual patients.

We thank A. Hagi (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc) for his important contributions to the experiments.

Received for publication April 25, 2006. Accepted for publication March 30, 2007.

  1. Moore FA. Effects of immune-enhancing diets on infectious morbidity and multiple organ failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.2001; 25(2 suppl):S36 –S42.[Free Full Text]
  2. Senkal M, Haaker R, Linseisen J, Wolfram G, Homann HH, Stehle P. Preoperative oral supplementation with long-chain omega-3 fatty acids beneficially alters phospholipid fatty acid patterns in liver, gut mucosa, and tumor tissue. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.2005; 29:236 –240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bastian L, Weimann A. Immunonutrition in patients after multiple trauma. Br J Nutr.2002; 87(suppl 1):S133 –S134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Heyland DK, Novak F, Drover JW, Jain M, Su X, Suchner U. Should immunonutrition become routine in critically ill patients? A systematic review of the evidence. JAMA.2001; 286:944 –953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Consensus recommendations from the US Summit on Immune-Enhancing Enteral Therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.2001; 25(2 suppl):S61 –S63.[Free Full Text]
  6. Furst P, Kuhn KS. Fish oil emulsions: what benefits can they bring?Clin Nutr. 2000;19:7 –14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. James MJ, Gibson RA, Cleland LG. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory mediator production. Am J Clin Nutr.2000; 71(1 suppl):343S –348S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Heller AR, Rossler S, Litz RJ, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids improve the diagnosis-related clinical outcome. Crit Care Med.2006; 34:972 –979.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Roulet M, Frascarolo P, Pilet M, Chapuis G. Effects of intravenously infused fish oil on platelet fatty acid phospholipid composition and on platelet function in postoperative trauma. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:296 –301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yao GX, Xue XB, Jiang ZM, Yang NF, Wilmore DW. Effects of perioperative parenteral glutamine-dipeptide supplementation on plasma endotoxin level, plasma endotoxin inactivation capacity and clinical outcome.Clin Nutr. 2005;24:510 –515.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hulsewe KW, van Acker BA, Hameeteman W, et al. Does glutamine-enriched parenteral nutrition really affect intestinal morphology and gut permeability? Clin Nutr.2004; 23:1217 –1225.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wu XT, Li JS, Zhao XF, et al. Effects of n-3 fatty acid, fructose-1,6-diphosphate and glutamine on mucosal cell proliferation and apoptosis of small bowel graft after transplantation in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:1323 –1326.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Avula CP, Zaman AK, Lawrence R, Fernandes G. Induction of apoptosis and apoptotic mediators in Balb/C splenic lymphocytes by dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. Lipids.1999; 34:921 –927.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Purasiri P, McKechnie A, Heys SD, Eremin O. Modulation in vitro of human natural cytotoxicity, lymphocyte proliferative response to mitogens and cytokine production by essential fatty acids.Immunology. 1997;92:166 –172.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Endres S, Meydani SN, Ghorbani R, Schindler R, Dinarello CA. Dietary supplementation with n-3 fatty acids suppresses interleukin-2 production and mononuclear cell proliferation. J Leukoc Biol.1993; 54:599 –603.[Abstract]
  16. Latham P, Lund EK, Brown JC, Johnson IT. Effects of cellular redox balance on induction of apoptosis by eicosapentaenoic acid in HT29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells and rat colon in vivo. Gut.2001; 49:97 –105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sitren HS, Heller PA, Bailey LB, Cerda JJ. Total parenteral nutrition in the mouse: development of a technique. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1983;7:582 –586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mahaffey SM, Copeland EM III, Talbert JL, Baumgartner TG, Sitren HS. Further studies of a technique for total parenteral nutrition in the mouse. Nutr Res. 1985;5:1121 –1130.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  19. Li J, Kudsk KA, Gocinski B, Dent D, Glezer J, Langkamp-Henken B. Effects of parenteral and enteral nutrition on gut-associated lymphoid tissue.J Trauma. 1995;39:44 –51; discussion 51–52.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497 –509.[Free Full Text]
  21. Metcalfe LD, Schmitz AA, Pelka JR. Rapid preparation of fatty acid esters from lipids for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal Chem.1966; 38:514 –515.
  22. Bannon CD, Craske JD, Hai NT, Harper NL, O'Rourke KL. Analysis of fatty acid methyl esters with high accuracy and reliability, II: methylation of fats and oils with boron trifluoride-methanol. J Chromatogr A. 1982;247:63 –69.[CrossRef]
  23. Kudsk KA, Li J, Renegar KB. Loss of upper respiratory tract immunity with parenteral feeding. Ann Surg.1996; 223:629 –635.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Johnson CD, Kudsk KA. Nutrition and intestinal mucosal immunity.Clin Nutr. 1999;18:337 –344.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Salmi M, Jalkanen S. Lymphocyte homing to the gut: attraction, adhesion, and commitment. Immunol Rev.2005; 206:100 –113.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. King BK, Kudsk KA, Li J, Wu Y, Renegar KB. Route and type of nutrition influence mucosal immunity to bacterial pneumonia. Ann Surg. 1999;229:272 –278.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Johnson CD, Kudsk KA, Fukatsu K, Renegar KB, Zarzaur BL. Route of nutrition influences generation of antibody-forming cells and initial defense to an active viral infection in the upper respiratory tract. Ann Surg. 2003;237:565 –573.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Alverdy JA, Aoys E, Weiss-Carrington P, Burke DA. The effect of glutamine-enriched TPN on gut immune cellularity. J Surg Res.1992; 52:34 –38.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wildhaber BE, Yang H, Teitelbaum DH. Total parenteral nutrition-induced apoptosis in mouse intestinal epithelium: modulation by keratinocyte growth factor. J Surg Res.2003; 112:144 –151.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Okamoto K, Fukatsu K, Ueno C, et al. T lymphocyte numbers in human gut associated lymphoid tissue are reduced without enteral nutrition.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.2005; 29:56 –58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wu Y, Kudsk KA, DeWitt RC, Tolley EA, Li J. Route and type of nutrition influence IgA-mediating intestinal cytokines. Ann Surg. 1999;229:662 –667.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Dunstan JA, Roper J, Mitoulas L, Hartmann PE, Simmer K, Prescott SL. The effect of supplementation with fish oil during pregnancy on breast milk immunoglobulin A, soluble CD14, cytokine levels and fatty acid composition. Clin Exp Allergy.2004; 34:1237 –1242.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Costabile M, Hii CS, Robinson BS, et al. A novel long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid, beta-Oxa 21:3n-3, inhibits T lymphocyte proliferation, cytokine production, delayed-type hypersensitivity, and carrageenan-induced paw reaction and selectively targets intracellular signals. J Immunol.2001; 167:3980 –3987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kudsk KA. Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition. Am J Surg.2002; 183:390 –398.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 31, No. 5, 416-422 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607107031005416


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeshima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mochizuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeshima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mochizuki, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*SAFFLOWER OIL
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?