Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loff, P. D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Staude, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loff, P. D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Staude, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Communications

Diethylhexylphthalate Extracted by Typical Newborn Lipid Emulsions From Polyvinylchloride Infusion Systems Causes Significant Changes in Histology of Rabbit Liver

P. D. Steffan Loff, MD*, Ulrike Subotic, MD{dagger}, Jasmina Oulmi-Kagermann, MD{ddagger}, Bettina Kränzlin, MD{ddagger}, Maria-Franziska Reinecke, MD§ and Christiane Staude{dagger}

From the * Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, University of Marburg, Germany; {dagger} Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, {ddagger} Center for Medical Research, and§ Department of Pharmacy, Klinikum Mannheim, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

Correspondence: P. D. Steffan Loff, MD, Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, Baldingerstraße, 35032 Marburg, Germany. Electronic mail may be sent to steffan.loff{at}web.de.

Background: Looking for a candidate substance inducing hepatobiliary dysfunction under parenteral nutrition (PN) in newborns, we recently discovered that newborn infusions extract large amounts of the plasticizer diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) from commonly used polyvinylchloride (PVC) infusion lines. This plasticizer is well known to be genotoxic and teratogenic in animals and to cause changes in various organs and enzyme systems even in humans. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of DEHP, extracted in the same way and in the same amount as in newborns, on livers of young rabbits. Methods: Prepubertal rabbits received lipid emulsion through central IV lines continuously for 3 weeks either via PVC or polyethylene (PE) infusion systems. Livers were examined after 1 and 3 weeks by light and electron microscopy. Results: By light microscopy, hydropic degeneration, single-cell necrosis, fibrosis, and bile duct proliferation were observed more in the PVC group. Electron microscopy revealed multiple nuclear changes, clusters and atypical forms of peroxisomes, proliferation of smooth endoplasmic reticulum, increased deposition of lipofuscin, and a mild perisinusoidal fibrosis only in the PVC group. These changes, which are generally regarded as reaction upon a toxic stimulus, could be exclusively attributed to DEHP. Conclusions: This investigation proved that DEHP produces toxin-like changes in livers of young rabbits in the same dose, duration, and method of administration as in newborn infants. For this reason, it is likely that DEHP is the substance that causes hepatobiliary dysfunction in newborns under PN. Possible modes of action of DEHP are proposed.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) induces hepatobiliary dysfunction in man and especially in preterm infants after 3–4 weeks of PN only.13 Cause and therapy of this complication are still unsolved.4 In most cases, the disease is self-limiting when PN is completely stopped. But when PN must continue due to a functional or anatomical short bowel syndrome, severe liver damage follows and frequently the children die from complications of liver fibrosis.5 For this reason, the problem has a considerable clinical impact.

Like other investigators, we were rapidly convinced that the liver damage is the effect of a toxic agent associated with PN.6,3 Many substances have been accused, among which were amino acids, especially methionine,4,6 toxic photodegradation products of PN,7 tryptophan,8 aluminum contaminations of the infusate,9 lithocholic acid produced under the conditions of enteral starvation,10,11 bacterial toxins due to bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation in the resting gut,12 and, recently, phytosterols, which have been proven to contaminate lipid emulsions frequently.13

Up to now, none of these possible causes have been convincing. Interestingly, methionine is toxic to the rat liver, but it is more toxic in combination with PN,14 and the same is true for aluminum.9 Bacterial translocation and toxins are relevant, but histologic typical hepatic lesions from PN differ from those of bacterial toxins.15,16

In an experimental study with weanling rats, Sokol et al17 detected that PN produces hepatic oxidative stress and glutathione depletion as soon as 5 days after initiation of PN. They found associated lipid peroxidation and hepatic injury but were not able to identify the source of oxidative stress.

Consequently, our group began to look for a substance that fulfills the following demands:

  • It should be part of PN since the beginning of PN 30 years ago.
  • The main target organ should be the liver.
  • Newborns should be affected much more than children and adults.
  • It should be able to resolve the contradictions of the studies mentioned before.

We started thinking about plasticizer, extracted from polyvinylchloride (PVC) infusion lines, as a possible candidate substance and detected that PVC infusion lines, with which PN usually is administered worldwide, leach large amounts of the plasticizer diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP).18,19 The absolute amount extracted by typical infusions for newborns and for older children receiving home PN was measured to be comparably high.18 Thus, the dose:body weight ratio is much higher in newborns, indicating a higher threat to the latter.

PN with PVC lines has invariably been correlated with the exposure of DEHP since the beginning of PN.

DEHP has been proven to be carcinogenic2024 and teratogenic25,26 and to cause damage in kidney,27 heart,28 liver,29 testis,30 and lungs31 of rodents and subprimates, but the liver was always regarded as the main target organ. Moreover, DEHP is suspected to affect kidney,27 heart,32 liver,33 lungs,34 and testis35 in man. Therefore, the theoretical demands concerning the accused substance were fulfilled by DEHP perfectly.

The extrapolation of results from rat studies to man are frequently questioned because the metabolism of rats and man differs considerably,36 the doses of DEHP in man are usually dimensions lower than in animal experiments,24 and the access for the highest doses in man is parenteral and in experimental animals through gavage. For these reasons, the load of DEHP extracted by typical newborn lipid infusions from PVC infusion lines was measured. We wondered whether this amount of DEHP would change liver histology in prepubertal rabbits when administered using the same IV access and the same time period as in infants. Rabbits were used because this model was successfully established in our department for long-term PN. Because it is well known that young livers in general are more prone to toxic changes and because it was our intention to imitate in the experiments the situation of an infant as well as possible, we choose young rabbits for the experiments.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 
The animal experiments were carried out in accordance with German law and approved by the commission for laboratory animal protection, Karlsruhe.

Prepubertal rabbits (about 1–1.5 kg) obtained from Harlan (Harlan Winkelmann GmbH, Borchen, Germany) were housed in individual cages with a 12-hour dark-light cycle, and controlled temperature (21°C) and moisture (50% relative saturation). Central venous access was established after 1 week of acclimatization. For this reason, animals were anaesthetized with xylazine and ketamine. The right lateral neck and interscapular region was carefully shaved and the animal fixed in a supine position, with the head turned left. Ointment was administered to protect the eyes from drying. A longitudinal skin incision at the right lateral neck exposed the V. maxillaris. A 20 gauge, 12-cm polyurethane catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) cut to the appropriate length was introduced and pushed forward into the brachiocephalic vein. The end of the catheter was exteriorized between the ears, thus producing a long subcutaneous tunnel to prevent the insertion area from infection. The exact procedure is described in detail by Zovko et al.37 After 1 week of healing and recovery from the operation, infusions started.

Fifteen prepubertal rabbits received daily 24 mL of lipid infusions continuously through PVC infusion systems for 3 weeks. This duration was chosen because long-term histologic liver changes in infants are usually seen after 3 weeks. One and 2 mg of DEHP were extracted by 24 mL of lipid infusion from the PVC line. This was measured by mass absorption–gas chromatograph and proved a daily load of DEHP of the rabbits in this group of 1 mg/kg. Ten prepubertal rabbits received the same lipid emulsions for the same time through polyethylene (PE) infusion systems. Except for this difference, the procedures in both groups were identical.

Nine rabbits with no infusions or manipulation served as controls. After 1 week, liver specimens were obtained by open surgery as described,37 and after 3 weeks the animals were killed and the livers obtained.

All liver specimens were divided into 2 pieces. One portion was fixated in buffered 3% formalin solution, embedded, cut, and stained with hematoxylin-eosine (HE). Then a pathologist examined the slides with light microscopy. A histologic scoring system was used as described for rabbit livers by Curran et al38: The histologic findings were scored on a scale of 0–3+. For balloon degeneration, 1+ indicates that ballooned cells extend <25% of the distance from the terminal hepatic vein to the portal triad, 2+ indicates that they extend 25%–50% of the distance, and 3+ indicates that they extend >50% of the distance. For portal inflammation, 1+ indicates that inflammatory cells are present but fill <25% of the area of the portal triad, 2+ indicates that they fill 25%–50% of the area, and 3+ indicates that they fill 50%–100% of the area. For portal fibrosis, 1+ indicates fibrosis limited to the triad area, 2+ indicates fibrosis extending beyond the triad, and 3+ indicates fibrosis with portal-to-portal bridging. For bile duct proliferation, the other portion was immediately fixed and processed for electron microscopical examination. The main steps of the procession of liver tissue samples for electron microscopy were as follows: the tissue samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). After fixation, the samples were washed with cacodylate buffer (4°C, 30 minutes) and then incubated in 1% reduced osmium tetroxide for 90 minutes. This was followed by a series of washing steps, first with cacodylate buffer followed by maleate buffer (0.05 M, pH 5.2). Thereafter, the samples were stained en bloc overnight in 1% uranyl acetate in maleate buffer. The incubation was followed by washing with maleate buffer. The samples were then dehydrated over an increasing alcohol gradient, starting with ethanol 75% (4°C, 30 minutes for each step). The dehydration was finished with 100% ethanol (20°C, 30 minutes). The samples were embedded in Spurr embedding medium according to Spurr.39 Polymerization of the samples in embedding medium was conducted into an embedding oven at 60°C over a period of 3 days (Agar Scientific, Essex, England). Ultrathin sections (50–80 nm) were cut from the embedded samples using a diamond knife (Diatome AG, Biel, Schweiz) mounted on a Leica Ultracut R Ultramicrotome (Leica, Bensheim, Germany). The sections were collected on copper grids and were counter-stained with alkaline lead citrate. Ultrastructural examination of the section was performed using a Zeiss EM 9S electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). All chemicals used were purchased from Serva (Serva, Heidelberg Germany).


Figure 1
View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Light microscopy of control animals shows portal fibrosis of a minor degree.

 
These studies were carried out by a biologist specializing in electron microscopy.


    RESULTS
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 
In light microscopy, the livers of the control animals without any treatment had a portal fibrosis of a minor degree (scoring 0.72) at autopsy (Figure 1). Half of the animals showed a few scattered mononuclear cells in the portal area. Single-cell necrosis and hydropic or fatty degeneration were almost absent. Fibrosis and bile duct proliferation were less pronounced in the control group (0.72 and 0.22; Figure 1) and the PE group (1.5 and 0.4; Figure 2) compared with the PVC group under the effect of DEHP (1.76 and 0.56; Figure 3). The PVC group showed remarkably more single-cell necrosis and foci of necrosis (0.9) than the PE group (0.25) and control group (0.05). Degenerative changes were low in the PVC and PE group but even more pronounced in the PVC group. For more details see Table I.


Figure 2
View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Light microscopy of polyethylene group shows similar changes as the control group, with portal fibrosis of a minor degree.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (185K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Light microscopy of polyvinylchloride group shows a higher degree of fibrosis and bile duct proliferation, more single-cell necrosis, and foci of necrosis, as well as a hydropic degeneration of hepatocytes (medium degree).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table I Scoring of light microscopy

 

Via electron microscopically, the following changes were found. In the control group (Figure 4), hepatocytes showed a round nucleus. The rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) exhibited a slight tendency to dilatation. Mitochondria were homogenous except for a few atypic forms. Peroxisomes and the Golgi apparatus were normal, as were the canaliculi. Lysosomes appeared sporadic. Glycogen content of the cells was considered to be moderate. The sinusoids had typical endothelial cells and normal Kupffer cells. The livers of the PE group (Figure 5) showed a mildly disturbed cell compartmentation. Changes of the nucleus were unremarkable and much less pronounced than in the PVC group. Peroxisomes were slightly increased, without clusters or atypic forms. The rER had a clear tendency of vesiculation. There was only weak proliferation of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER). The canaliculi had a stronger atrophy of microvilli, and myelin bodies were more prominent than in the PVC group. The sinusoids were inconspicuous. In the PVC group (Figure 6), the livers had a clearly disturbed cell compartmentation. The nucleus showed frequently heterochromatin condensation in the periphery, increased number of nucleoli with peripheral displacement, and striking structure. The peroxisomes were increased, showing clusters, atypical forms, and marked paracrystalline structures. There was a clear proliferation of sER, with a local association to the peroxisomes. Lysosomal structures were increased, especially lipolysosomes and depositions of lipofuscin. The glycogen content was reduced. Within the sinusoids, slight changes of the Kupffer cells and a mild perisinusoidal fibrosis were found (Table II).


Figure 4
View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. Electron microcopy of control group (x 3500). rER, rough endoplasmic reticulum.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. Electron microscopy of PE group (x 7000). PE, polyethylene.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6. Electron microscopy of polyvinylchloride (PVC) group (x 7000). rER, rough endoplasmic reticulum; sER, smooth endoplasmic reticulum.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table II Electron microscopy: main differences between the groups

 


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 
We suspected DEHP, extracted from PVC infusion lines, to be involved in PN-induced hepatobiliary dysfunction of neonates. Our prior investigation of the leachability revealed that large amounts of DEHP are extracted by lipid emulsions from PVC infusion lines under conditions typical for premature newborns.18,19

In the experiments presented here, young rabbits were exposed to DEHP (see Materials and Methods) comparable in dose, duration, and way of access to those in neonates. The only difference between the 2 experimental groups was the use of PE infusion systems in 1 group and PVC infusion systems in the other, implicating a dose of 1 mg/kg/d of DEHP in the PVC group. Differences in liver histology could be attributed exclusively to this fact. We found obvious differences of the liver specimens between both groups in light and electron microscopy. The changes in light microscopy indicated a toxic effect in the PVC group with increased cell necrosis, fibrosis,40 and bile duct proliferation after 3 weeks of application. These results were supported by characteristic differences between both experimental groups in electron microscopy. Here, the PVC group showed changes of the nucleuslike heterochromatin condensation in the periphery and proliferation of sER, which are typical electron microscopical signs for toxic damage.41 Increased number, clusters, and atypical forms of peroxisomes, as well as augmented lipofuscin pigment, is a sign of increased oxidative stress.41 The detection of perisinusoidal fibrosis was in accordance with the increased fibrosis seen in light microscopy.

In conclusion, there can be no doubt that the animals of the PVC group experienced a toxic effect and an enhanced oxidative stress, whereas the animals from the PE group did only to a minor degree. These effects in the PVC group must be attributed to the extraction of DEHP from the infusion lines.

Still it remains to be elucidated why the PE group showed mild but visible changes. It is unclear whether this was a general reaction of the livers to lipid emulsion or a minor toxic effect due to the DEHP immanent in the lipid emulsion before perfusion of the PVC lines.

It is well known that DEHP alters the activity of multiple liver enzymes, especially those of phase I and II of biotransformation of xenobiotics. Two possible means of action are shown in Figure 7, modified from a scheme of the Oxford Textbook of Pathology.41 Both acetaminophen and menadione are commonly used in infants. When the oxidoreductase is blocked in the metabolism of menadione, alternative pathways produce a highly liver-toxic intermediate. In the case of dicumarol, the enhanced toxicity of menadione on the liver is proved. DEHP is proved to inhibit the oxidoreductase as well in rat testis by 45%.42


Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7. Possible interference of diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) with metabolism of menadione and paracetamol. NADPH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate.

 

In the metabolism of acetaminophen, a liver-toxic intermediate is generated when the common pathway is saturated or the toxic alternative pathway is stimulated. A stimulation of the cytochrome P-450 group by DEHP in animal livers has been shown by several investigators.33,4346 The toxic effects on rabbit livers in the PVC group of our experiments, as well as toxic effects on the liver of infants receiving long-term PN with PVC systems, can be easily explained:

We suggest that the capacity of the liver cells to detoxify endogenous or exogenous toxins is impaired by DEHP through inhibition of detoxifying enzymes or stimulation of toxifying metabolic pathways, thus generating toxic effects and oxidative stress visible in light and electron microscopy.

This new idea in understanding PN-induced hepatobiliary dysfunction would explain many clinical observations of this disease and supposed contradictions of different experimental investigations. One next step would be to prove an effect of DEHP doses on human liver tissue. For this reason, we are currently investigating human liver cell cultures exposed to DEHP, which is extracted by lipid emulsions from PVC infusion lines.

Received for publication July 13, 2006. Accepted for publication October 12, 2006.

  1. Beale EF, Nelson RM, Bucciarelli RL, Donnelly WH, Eitzman DV. Intrahepatic cholestasis associated with parenteral nutrition in premature infants. Pediatrics.1979; 64:342 –347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Balistreri W, Bove K. Hepatobiliary consequences of parenteral alimentation. In: Popper H, Schaffner F, eds. Progression in Liver Diseases. Vol 9. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1990:567 –601.
  3. Merritt RJ. Cholestasis associated with total parenteral nutrition.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1986; 5:9 –22.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Moss RL, Amii LA. New approaches to understanding the etiology and treatment of total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1999;8:140 –147.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hodes JE, Grosfeld JL, Weber TR, Schreiner RL, Fitzgerald JF, Mirkin LD. Hepatic failure in infants on total parenteral nutrition: clinical and histopathological observations. J Pediatr Surg.1982; 17:463 –468.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Moss RL, Das JB, Raffensperger JG. Total parenteral nutritionassociated cholestasis: clinical and histopathologic correlations.J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28:1270 –1275.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bhatia J, Moslen MT, Haque AK, McCleery R, Rassin DK. Total parenteral nutrition-associated alterations in hepatobiliary function and histology in rats: is light exposure a clue? Pediatr Res.1993; 33:487 –492.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Grant JP, Cox CE, Kleinman LM, et al. Serum hepatic enzyme and bilirubin elevations during total parenteral nutrition. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977;145:573 –580.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Demircan M, Ergün O, Coker C, Yilmaz F, Avanoglu S, Ozok G. Aluminium in total parenteral nutrition solutions produces portal inflammation in rats. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1998; 26:274 –278.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Gleghorn E, Merritt R, Henton D, Neustein HM, Landing B, Sinatra FR. A subacute rabbit model for hepatobiliary dysfunction during total parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1989; 9:246 –255.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Das JB, Uzoaru IL, Ansari GG. Biliary lithocholate and cholestasis during and after total parenteral nutrition: an experimental study.Proc Soc Exp Biol Med.1995; 210:253 –259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wolf A, Pohlandt F. Bacterial infection: the main cause of acute cholestasis in newborn infants receiving short-term parenteral nutrition.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1989; 8:297 –303.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Iyer K, Spitz L, Clayton P. New insight into mechanisms of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis: role of plant sterols. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:1 –6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Moss RL, Haynes AL, Pastuszyn A, Glew RH. Methionine infusion reproduces liver injury of parenteral nutrition cholestasis. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:664 –668.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Shu Z, Li J, Zhou Z, Shi QL, Zhang TH. Histopathologic study of cholestasis induced by total parenteral nutrition or intraperitoneal sepsis in rats. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1991; 15:630 –636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Moss RL, Das JB, Raffensperger JG. Necrotizing enterocolitis and total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis. Nutrition.1996; 12:340 –343.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Sokol R, Taylor S, Devereaux M, et al. Hepatic oxidant injury and glutathione depletion during total parenteral nutrition in weanling rats.Am J Physiol. 1996;270:691 –700.
  18. Loff S, Kabs F, Witt K, et al. Polyvinylchloride infusion lines expose infants to large amounts of toxic plasticizers. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:1775 –1781.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Loff S, Kabs F, Subotic U, Schaible T, Reinecke F, Langbein M. Kinetics of diethylhexyl-phthalate extraction from polyvinylchloride infusion lines. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.2002; 26:305 –309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Cattley RC, Conway JG, Popp JA. Association of persistent peroxisome proliferation and oxidative injury with hepatocarcinogenicity in female F-344 rats fed di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate for 2 years. Cancer Lett. 1987;38:15 –22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Takagi A, Sai K, Umemura T, Hasegawa R, Kurokawa Y. Significant increase of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in liver DNA of rats following short-term exposure to the peroxisome proliferators di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and di (2-ethylhexyl) adipate. Jpn J Cancer Res.1990; 81:213 –215.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  22. Tomaszewski K, Agarwal D, Melnick R. In vitro steady-state levels of hydrogen peroxide after exposure of male F-344 rats and female B6C3F1 mice to hepatic peroxisome proliferators.Carcinogenesis. 1986;7:1871 –1876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ward J, Diwan B, Ohshima M, Hu H, Schuller HM, Rice JM. Tumor-initiating and promoting activities of di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in vivo and in vitro. Environ Health Perspect. 1986;65:279 –291.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Huber W, Grasl-Kraupp B, Schulte-Hermann R. Hepatocarcinogenic potential of di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in rodents and its implications on human risk. Crit Rev Toxicol.1996; 26:365 –481.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hellwig J, Freudenberger H, Jackh R. Differential prenatal toxicity of branched phthalate esters in rats. Food Chem Toxicol.1997; 35:501 –512.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Peters J, Taubeneck M, Keen C, Gonzalez FJ. Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate induces a functional zinc deficiency during pregnancy and teratogenesis that is independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. Teratology.1997; 56:311 –316.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Crocker J, Safe S, Acott P. Effects of chronic phthalate exposure on the kidney. J Toxicol Environ Health.1988; 23:433 –444.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Rock G, Labow R, Franklin C, Burnett R, Tocchi M. Hypotension and cardiac arrest in rats following infusion of mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, a contaminant of stored blood. N Engl J Med.1987; 316:1218 –1219.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Jacobson M, Kevy S, Grand R. Effects of a plasticizer leached from polyvinyl chloride on the subhuman primate: a consequence of chronic transfusion therapy. J Lab Clin Med.1977; 89:1066 –1079.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sjöberg P, Lindquist N, Montin G, Ploen L. Effects of repeated intravenous infusions of the plasticizer di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in young male rats. Arch Toxicol.1985; 58:78 –83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Doelman C, Borm P, Bast A. Plasticizer and bronchial hyperreactivity [letter]. Lancet.1990; 335:725 .[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Barry Y, Labow R, Rock G, Keon WJ. Cardiotoxic effects of the plasticizer metabolite, mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, on human myocardium.Blood. 1988;72:1438 –1439.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ganning A, Brunk U, Dallner G. Phthalate esters and their effect on the liver. Hepatology.1984; 4:541 –547.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Roth B, Herkenrath P, Lehmann H, et al. Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate as plasticizer in PVC respiratory tubing systems: indications of hazardous effects on pulmonary function in mechanically ventilated, preterm infants.Eur J Pediatr. 1988;147:41 –46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Hardell L, Ohlson C, Fredrikson M. Occupational exposure to polyvinyl chloride as a risk factor for testicular cancer evaluated in a case-control study. Int J Cancer.1997; 73:828 –830.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Short R, Robinson E, Lington A, Chin AE. Metabolic and peroxisome proliferation studies with di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in rats and monkeys.Toxicol Ind Health. 1987;3:185 –195.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Zovko D, Loff S, Dzakovic A, et al. Long-term total parenteral nutrition and cholecystostomy tube in a rabbit model: surgical procedure, management and preliminary results. Res Exp Med.1996; 196:235 –242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Curran T, Uzoaru I, Das J, Ansari G, Raffensperger JG. The effect of cholecystokinin-octapeptide on the hepatobiliary dysfunction caused by total parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Surg.1995; 30:242 –247.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Spurr AR. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res.1969; 26:31 –43.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Rappaport A. Physioanatomical basis of toxic liver injury. In: Farber E, Fisher M, eds. Toxic Injury of the Liver, Vol II. New York, NY: Dekker; 1979:1 –57.
  41. Wyllie A, Duvall E. Cell injury and death. In: McGee J, Isaacson P, Wright N, eds. Oxford Textbook of Pathology: Volume I: Principles of Pathology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press;1992 : 141–193.
  42. Mehrotra K, Morgenstern R, Lundqvist R, Beccedas L, Bengtsson-Ahlberg M, Georgellis A. Effects of peroxisome proliferators and/or hypothyroidism on xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in rat testis. Chem Biol Interact. 1997;104:131 –145.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Lake B, Rijcken W, Gray T, Foster J, Gangolli S. Comparative studies of the hepatic effects of di- and mono-n-octylphthalates, di-ethylhexyl phthalate and clofibrate in the rat. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1984;54:167 –176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Ganning A, Olsson M, Brunk U, Dallner G. Effects of prolonged treatment with phthalate ester on rat liver. Pharmacol Toxicol.1991; 68:392 –401.
  45. Kurata Y, Kidachi F, Yokoyama M, Toyota N, Tsutchitani M, Katoh M. Subchronic toxicity of di-ethylhexyl phthalate in common marmosets: lack of hepatic peroxisome proliferation, testicular atrophy, or pancreatic acinar cell hyperplasia. Toxicol Sci.1998; 42:49 –56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Agarwal D, Agarwal S, Seth P. Effect of KI-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on drug metabolism, lipid peroxidation and sulfhydryl content of rat liver.Drug Metabol Dis. 1982;10:77 –80.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 31, No. 3, 188-193 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607107031003188


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loff, P. D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Staude, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loff, P. D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Staude, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?