|
|
Treatment of Catheter Occlusion in Pediatric Patients
John A. Kerner, Jr, MD*, ,
Manuel G. Garcia-Careaga, MD*, ,
Amy A. Fisher, MS, RN, CNSN and
Robert L. Poole, PharmD
From the * Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology,
Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University
Medical Center, Stanford, California; and the
Department of Pharmacy, Lucile Packard
Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California
Correspondence: John A. Kerner, Jr, MD, Division of Pediatric
Gastroenterology, 750 Welch Road, Suite 116, Palo Alto, CA 94304. Electronic
mail may be sent to
jkerner{at}stanfordmed.org.
A proper initial assessment of catheter occlusion is the key to successful
management. The assessment screens are for both thrombotic and nonthrombotic
causes (including mechanical occlusion). If mechanical occlusion is excluded,
thrombotic occlusion is treated with alteplase. Nonthrombotic occlusions are
treated according to their primary etiologies: lipid occlusion is treated with
70% ethanol, mineral precipitates are treated with 0.1-N hydrochloric acid
(HCl), drug precipitates are treated according to their pH—acidic drugs
can be cleared with 0.1-N HCl, basic medications can be cleared with sodium
bicarbonate or 0.1-N sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Prevention of occlusion of
central venous access devices is also critical. To date, no data conclusively
show heparin flushes to be superior to saline flushes. No prophylactic
regimen, including low-dose warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or 1 unit
heparin/mL of parenteral nutrition has been endorsed by any major medical,
nursing, or pharmacy group due to lack of scientific evidence. The most
encouraging information on decreasing occlusion rate comes from experience
with positive-pressure devices that attach to the hub of most catheter lumens
and prevent retrograde blood flow and, consequently, decrease the risk of
thrombus formation in the catheter lumen.
It is estimated that >5 million central venous access devices (CVADs)
are inserted in patients in the United States each year and that up to 25% of
these catheters will develop problems with
occlusion.1 Catheter
occlusion occurs at a rate of 0.071 episodes per catheter-year in home
parenteral nutrition (HPN)
patients.2 An
analysis of >50,000 CVADs used in home care patients revealed that
approximately 5% of the devices experienced a loss of
patency.3
Gorski4 found
occlusion rates of 6.5% in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and
1.8% in non-PICC CVADs in a 4-year analysis of CVAD-related outcomes for 1
home care agency.
 |
Catheter Occlusion: Definition
|
|---|
Catheter occlusion is defined as a partial or complete obstruction of the
CVAD that limits or prevents the ability to withdraw blood, flush the
catheter, or administer parenteral solutions or medications. Catheter
occlusion is a significant complication because infusion therapy may be
delayed or interrupted. In many cases, catheter occlusion can be treated,
avoiding the trauma and cost of catheter removal and
replacement.4
 |
Primary Assessment of Catheter Occlusion
|
|---|
The proper assessment of catheter occlusions is key to successful
management. The primary assessment should include screening for both
thrombotic and nonthrombotic occlusions
(Table I).
The following steps are suggested: (a) screen for extrinsic compression
from clamps, sutures, and kinked catheter tubing; (b) check catheter function
in terms of infusion and blood aspiration; (c) assess whether the occlusion is
relieved by postural changes such as raising the ipsilateral arm and shrugging
the shoulders forward; (d) take a careful history of what was recently infused
through the catheter (eg, medications, blood products); (e) perform a careful
physical examination, looking for signs of edema, redness, pain, or dilated
vessels.
CVADs can migrate at any
time.5 Radiographic
studies to confirm CVAD placement or device patency should be performed.
Another potential mechanical problem is "pinch-off syndrome."
Blood return is only obtained when the patient's arm, on the same side as the
catheter insertion site, is raised parallel to the shoulder. This maneuver
indicates the catheter is compressed between the clavicle and the first rib.
Pinch-off syndrome can lead to catheter fracture and embolism. Removal of the
catheter and placement of a new catheter lateral to the midclavicular line is
recommended.6,7
Suspect malpositioning if you have difficulty aspirating fluid from the
catheter and that difficulty resolves after the patient coughs, performs a
Valsalva maneuver, or changes his body position. If these actions solve the
problem only temporarily, the physician may need to partially withdraw the
catheter or reposition it using
fluoroscopy.7
 |
Thrombotic Catheter Occlusion
|
|---|
Thrombotic catheter occlusions account for approximately 60% of all
catheter occlusions1
(Table I). They occur when
deposits of fibrin and blood components within and around CVADs impede or
disrupt flow through the
catheter.4 PICC
lines may be more prone to thrombotic occlusion due to their longer length and
smaller diameter.8
Thrombotic occlusions may slowly develop over time or occur
suddenly.4 There are
4 main types of thrombotic occlusions
(Table II). These 4 types have
been well described
previously.4,9,10
Thrombotic occlusions may contribute to the development of CVAD-related
infection because the blood clot serves as a rich culture medium for bacterial
growth.11
Clinicians should be aware that when a patient has a multilumen CVAD, it is
not acceptable practice to leave an occluded lumen untreated just because
another lumen is functional.
In the past, urokinase (Abbokinase, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL)
was the drug of choice for treating thrombotic CVAD occlusions. The US Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) halted the shipment of urokinase in 1999, citing
manufacturing deficiencies, specifically having concerns of transmission of
infectious agents. Streptokinase, a thrombolytic agent derived from group C
β-hemolytic streptococci, was not considered an optimal alternative due
to FDA warnings regarding the risk of life-threatening
anaphylaxis.12
Clinicians began to evaluate alteplase (t-PA) as an alternative declotting
agent. In 1994, when urokinase was still the standard for catheter declotting,
it was demonstrated that a low dose of t-PA was actually more successful than
urokinase in restoring catheter
function.13 This
randomized trial compared use of a 2-mg dose of t-PA to a 10,000-unit dose of
urokinase (twice the normal dosage) in occluded catheters as confirmed by a
radiographic dye study. Return of catheter function occurred in 89% of
t-PA-treated catheters vs 59% in the urokinase-treated catheters
(p = .013). In both groups, up to 2 doses of drug were
administered.
t-PA is genetically engineered human tissue–plasminogen activase. It
works by acting on fibrin-bound plasminogen (clot), producing plasmin at the
surface of the clot, which works from the outside in to cause lysis of the
clot.
Two major phase III trials were initiated in July 1999 to evaluate t-PA as
a possible alternative to urokinase in clearing occluded catheters without
x-ray verification. The first trial (Cardiovascular thrombolytic to Open
Occluded Lines; COOL-1) was a double-blind, randomized, prospective study
comparing t-PA (2 mg/2 mL) to placebo in 149
patients.14
Function was restored in 74% of catheters treated with a single dose of t-PA
vs 17% for placebo (p < .0001). Cumulative efficacy after
up to 2 doses was 90%, with no reported drug-related adverse events. The
second trial (COOL-2) was an open-label, single-arm study in nearly 1000
patients with dysfunctional CVADs. The COOL-2 study enrolled 995 patients
between the ages of 2 and 91 years and demonstrated that t-PA treatment was
highly effective in restoring catheter function (88%) with minimal adverse
events.15 The doses
of t-PA in COOL-1 and COOL-2 were:
- Patients
30 kg received 2 mg in 2 mL to fill the lumen of the
catheter.
- Patients <30 kg received a dose equal to 110% of the internal catheter
volume.
- Dysfunctional catheters were defined by the inability to withdraw 3 mL of
blood. Patients were excluded from the study if it was not possible to infuse
the necessary volume of study drug into the CVAD. In both COOL-1 and COOL-2,
the primary safety end-point was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 5 days;
combining the patients from the 2 studies (n = 1064
patients),16 there
were no incidences of ICH and no embolic events within 30 days of treatment.
Other side effects included gastrointestinal bleeding (0.3%), thrombosis
(0.3%), and sepsis (0.4%). One event (fever) was attributed to the study
drug.16 Due to the
rare adverse reactions of sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and deep-vein
thrombosis (DVT), it is recommended that t-PA be used with caution if there is
known or suspected catheter-related infection and in patients with bleeding
disorders or who are at risk for
bleeding.4,16
- In unpublished observations, we evaluated the results of the pediatric
patients ages 2–17 in COOL-1 (n = 12) and COOL-2 (n = 117). In COOL-1,
there was restoration of function in 5 of 6 (83.3%) catheters in the t-PA arm
vs 1 of 6 (16.7%) catheters in the placebo arm. In COOL-2, 100/114
(87.7%) had catheter function restored after 2 doses of t-PA. Shen and
coworkers17 did a
pediatric subgroup analysis of subjects 2 through 18 years of age in COOL-2.
Restoration of function of the catheters occurred in 87% who received up to 2
doses of t-PA.17
T-PA (Cathflo Activase, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) was approved for
catheter clearance in adults in September 2001; the FDA requested additional
data in the pediatric population. In March 2002, the phase IIIB, multicenter,
prospective, single-arm, open-label, FDA study began in the pediatric
population—Cathflo Activase in Pediatrics Study (CAPS). The study, not
yet published, has been completed in 310 children: 55 <2 years and 255
2 years. Preliminary data from the Investigator Close-out meeting, October
2003, Orlando, Florida, show that Cathflo Activase is safe in both patients
<2 years of age and the general pediatric population <17 years of age.
No ICH, major hemorrhage, thrombosis, or embolic events occurred. Incidence of
protocol-defined sepsis was similar to that seen in COOL-2. The high rate of
efficacy in restoring catheter function was similar to that seen in COOL-1 and
COOL-2.
- Several recent studies in pediatric patients have shown similar efficacy
with minimal side effects. Jacobs et
al18 reported the
use of t-PA in managing occluded catheters in 228 children. The overall
efficacy rate was 91%, with no adverse events attributed to t-PA treatment.
Fisher et al19
cleared 95% of occluded catheters in 21 pediatric patients. Choi et
al20 restored
catheter patency in 85% of catheters in 25 children. Chesler et
al21 demonstrated a
complete response to treatment in 37 of 42 pediatric patients (88% success
rate). Our protocol for the use of t-PA in pediatric patients is shown in
Figure 1.
- Recently, Svoboda and
colleagues22 have
studied recombinant urokinase (r-UK). Pediatric and adult patients with any
type of CVAD occlusion of any duration were entered in this multicenter,
open-label study to test the hypothesis that a new r-UK is safe and effective
in reestablishing patency in a large unselected cohort of occluded CVADs. All
were treated with 5000 IU/mL intracatheter r-UK. r-UK instillations totaling
903 in 878 patients (ages 16 days to 96 years) resulted in restoring patency
to at least 1 occluded lumen in 79% of devices (712 of 902). Patency was
restored equally in catheters with total occlusion (76%) as in patients with
only "withdrawal occlusion" (75%). Median time to patency was 15
± 26.8 minutes (range, 5–203 minutes). One-third of the catheters
in the study were totally occluded. The drug proved to be both safe and
effective. Haire et
al23 performed a
phase III multicenter double-blinded study of r-UK (5000 IU r-UK vs
placebo). If there was no response after 30 minutes, a second dose was given.
If there was no response after 1 hour, 2 open-label r-UK doses were given.
Haire and colleagues studied 180 patients (20% were
18 years of age). R-UK
was significantly better than placebo: 54% vs 30% for restoring
catheter function. There was no difference in the side effects in the 2
groups. In the accompanying editorial to Dr Svoboda's work,
Horne24 pointed out
that r-UK is currently not marketed and that previous work suggests that t-PA
will perform better than
r-UK.13 Horne
suggested that t-PA could achieve the same success rates in totally obstructed
catheters using the technique used by Dr Svoboda and colleagues, using a 3-way
stopcock. In this method, a syringe containing the medication, an empty 12-mL
syringe, and the catheter lumen are each attached to one part of the stopcock.
First, the empty syringe and catheter lumen are opened and the syringe is
pulled back to the 10-mL marking and then closed. This creates negative
pressure within the catheter. Opening the stopcock to the medication allows it
to be pulled into the catheter. This method reduces the risk of catheter
rupture as the pharmacologic agents are not instilled under positive
pressure.
- Reteplase (Retavase, Centocor, Inc, Malvern, PA) is a new recombinant
tissue plasminogen activator similar to t-PA but is missing several structural
domains. Fibrinolysis with t-PA proceeds from the outer surface of the
thrombus to the inner mesh. Reteplase, due to its unique structure, may result
in increased thrombus penetration and allow fibrinolysis to occur throughout
the thrombus.
- A retrospective analysis of a single 0.4-unit dose of reteplase in adults
with occluded catheters was shown to restore patency to 74% of the CVADs, with
dwell times of 30
minutes.25
Reteplase was given to 15 clotted CVCs in children with
cancer.26 The study
was a dose escalation trial, initiated at 0.1 units and increased by
increments of 0.1 units to a maximum dose of 0.4 units. Twelve of the 15
catheters cleared, with an average dwell time of 38 minutes (time to patency
did not correlate with the dose). No adverse events were reported. Reteplase
appears to have a comparable efficacy with t-PA, but reteplase may require
shorter dwell times. In adults, an open-label single-arm prospective trial was
performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of
reteplase.27
Reteplase (0.4 units) was installed into each catheter lumen, with a dwell
time of 30 minutes in patients with cancer and a dysfunctional CVAD. If the
first dose failed, 30 extra minutes of dwell time were given; if there was no
function at 1 hour, a second dose was instilled for 60 more minutes (120
minutes with up to 2 doses). One hundred thirty-nine patients were studied. By
30 minutes, 66.9% of catheters cleared; success rates were 88.5%, 94.7%, and
94.7% at 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 120 minutes, respectively. There were no
adverse effects. A prospective, randomized, clinical trial is warranted to
compare safety and efficacy of t-PA vs reteplase.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. Pediatric order form for the use of alteplase. Reprinted with permission
from the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford.
|
|
 |
Nonthrombotic Catheter Occlusion
|
|---|
Once the mechanical causes of catheter occlusion have been excluded by
careful assessment, nonthrombotic occlusion causes should be considered, and
should include drug or mineral precipitates and lipid residue.
Fat Deposition. Pennington and
Pithie28 observed
increased resistance when flushing the catheter for several days before the
catheter completely occludes with lipid sludge. Five patients had received
"all-inone" PN with lipid occlusions. Four out of 5 catheters
cleared after 3 mL of 70% ethanol was left in situ for 1 hour; then
the catheter was flushed with saline and heparinized.
Pennington,29 in
a subsequent letter to the editor, stated that if urokinase was given first in
a lipid occlusion, complete occlusion would occur. Further, he recommended
that patients successfully treated with ethanol should replace their saline
flush with a flush of 10 mL of 20% ethanol; he believed that such ethanol
flushes led to a reduction in incidence of occlusion.
Erdman et al30
showed in a pediatric study of 15 cases that lipid buildup was less likely
with 3-in-1 solutions used within 28 hours (in inpatients) vs longer
storage periods (up to 7 days) in the home setting. Their group showed that
separate (SPLIT) infusions of IV fat and glucose/amino acid solutions (ie,
separate infusions of the IV fat and of the glucose amino acid, with the IV
fat infusion "Y'd" in just above the entry to the vein) decrease
the incidence of occlusion. Line life in the SPLIT group was 290 days (n = 7);
in the 3-in-1 group, line life was only 70 days (n = 8).
In pediatric patients, Werlin et
al31 identified 10
of 26 occlusions associated with lipid administration. His group used 0.55
mL/kg 70% ethanol (to a maximum of 3 mL). In adult patients, ter Borg et
al32 showed that
slow infusion of 10–20 mL of 0.1 mmol/mL NaOH successfully improved
occlusion from 3-in-1 solutions in 13 adults. They postulated the catheter
occlusion etiology was lipid-fibrin occlusions. Interestingly, we reported a
case of a pediatric patient with an occlusion caused by fibrofatty tissue, a
combination of fibrin and
fat.33 We cleared
the occlusion after multiple treatments with urokinase and ethanol. An ethanol
installation finally cleared the catheter.
An ethanol lock has recently been shown to aid in the treatment of
bloodstream infections in pediatric oncology patients with Broviac
catheters.34
Eighteen patients had the ethanol-lock technique and IV antibiotics; 13
patients had IV antibiotics alone. Within 4 weeks of treatment, no relapse of
any kind occurred in 67% of those treated with the ethanol-lock and 47%
treated only with
antibiotics.34 A
31-year-old patient with recurrent catheter-related sepsis had 22 admissions
for catheter-related infection from 1993 to 2000 and no infections
after using an ethanol lock daily from 2001 through
2003.35
Calcium Phosphate Precipitates. Hydrochloric acid has been used to
dissolve calcium phosphate precipitates that occluded catheters as a result of
PN solutions containing high concentrations of calcium and
phosphorus.36–39
The solubility of calcium phosphate decreases with increased pH, increased
concentrations of calcium and phosphorus, elevated temperature (common in
neonatal ICU hotbeds), and time since preparation. Infants have increased
daily requirements of calcium and phosphorus, and if they are critically ill,
fluid restriction may be necessary. These 2 factors may increase the risk of
calcium phosphate precipitation, resulting in catheter
occlusion.38
Holcombe and
colleagues40 inject
a volume of up to 1 mL of 0.1-N HCl into the CVAD to restore patency. This
small amount is unlikely to cause a metabolic
acidosis.36 Breaux
et al37 reported
that 42% of patients who received 0.1-N HCl irrigations into their CVADs had a
febrile reaction. Duffy et
al38 reported no
adverse reactions because the HCl was aspirated from the catheter rather than
infused. Werlin et
al31 infused up to
3 mL of 0.1-N HCl (up to 1 mL in infants between 1 and 3 kg). A 1-mL syringe
containing 0.5 mL of the solution is connected to the catheter hub and a
gentle push-pull motion applied to the syringe plunger. If the catheter did
not clear, treatment remains in the line up to 1 hour; then it is aspirated.
Werlin et al31
demonstrated 3 mineral precipitates in their series. Shulman et
al36 gave
0.2–1.0 mL 0.1-N HCl and cleared 2 of 2 calcium-phosphate
precipitates.
Of further interest is a fascinating study from Canada. In a retrospective
review, 42 pediatric oncology patients at the Children's Hospital at Westmead,
Canada, received IV antibiotics and 2-M HCl between 1994 and
2000.41 These
patients had persistent positive blood cultures after 48 hours of IV
antibiotic treatment. HCl installation was then added to the regimen.
Sixty-seven percent of the infection episodes were eradicated. The above
treatment enabled both (1) catheter salvage and (2) eradication of
antibiotic-refractory catheter-related
infection.41
Drug Precipitates. The administration of medications that have low
solubility is often incompatible with PN solutions or is incompatible with
other drugs and can result in a precipitate that occludes the CVAD. These
occlusions are usually sudden and occur with infusion of a drug or heparin.
They are often the result of inadequate flushing techniques between drug
administration or between drug and PN
administration.42
The method for clearing those precipitates depends on the pH of the drug.
Acidic drugs such as vancomycin and etoposide can be cleared using 0.1-N
hydrochloric acid (0.1-N
HCl)39; 0.1-N HCl
was also used to clear a catheter occlusion secondary to the sequential
administration of amikacin, piperacillin, vancomycin, and
heparin.36 When the
occlusion is suspected to be the result of basic medications (eg, ticarcillin,
oxacillin, heparin, phenytoin, imipenem) it can be cleared with sodium
bicarbonate (1 mL of 1
mEq/mL)40 or 0.1-N
NaOH.42 Shulman et
al36 cleared 2
pediatric drug precipitates with 0.1-N HCl. Werlin et
al31 cleared 13
pediatric drug precipitates with 0.1-N HCl.
 |
Prevention of Catheter Occlusion
|
|---|
Nursing Interventions. Using a normal saline flush before and
after administration of blood, blood products, and medications; before and
after blood sampling; and at each IV tubing change is recommended to minimize
the number of
occlusions.43 When
flushing the catheter, it is recommended to use the
"push-stop-push-stop" technique to create turbulent flow and
reduce the buildup of residue on the inner surface of the
catheter.4 When
administering medications, we recommend using the SASH (saline-administer
drug-saline-heparin) procedure. Using a positive-end pressure technique while
flushing, such as clamping the CVAD while maintaining syringe pressure,
minimizes blood reflux and is an Infusion Nursing Society (INS) standard of
practice.44
A positive-pressure device can be attached to the hubs of most CVAD lumens.
These devices maintain positive pressure within the lumen when syringes and IV
tubing are disconnected from the catheter, preventing backflow of blood that
can result in occlusion. Examples of such devices include the CLC2000 adapter
valve (ICU Medical, San Clemente, CA) and the PASV valve (Boston Scientific
Corporation, Natick, MA) and the MaxPlus positive flow needleless connector
(Maximus Medical Products, Inc, Ontario, CA). Rummel et
al45 have recently
shown that the use of a positive pressure device (the CLC2000) in 10 patients
on an oncology inpatient unit decreased the incidence of catheter-related
thrombus (CRT) and CRT-related costs. We have found a decreased incidence in
catheter occlusion since our hospital began to use such positive-pressure
devices.
Heparin. The addition of heparin (1000 units/L) to the PN solution
to prevent thrombosis is controversial; no randomized, controlled studies have
demonstrated benefit. Heparin administration can result in heparin induced
thrombocytopenia (HIT) and loss of bone
mineral.2
FLUSHES. Several recent studies have shown no benefit from
heparin flushes of catheters compared with saline flushes in preventing
catheter
occlusion.46,47
ADDING HEPARIN TO PN. A randomized controlled trial of heparin
for prevention of catheter occlusions in PICC lines showed no difference in
infants receiving PN with 1 unit/mL of heparin vs those with no
heparin.48
META-ANALYSIS. Randolf et
al49 performed an
elegant meta-analysis on the benefit of heparin in central venous and
pulmonary artery catheters. Twelve separate trials were included in their
analysis. For catheter thrombus or fibrin sheath, there was a trend for
heparin to be beneficial in preventing catheter thrombi or fibrin sleeves;
however, this finding did not reach statistical significance.
In contrast, heparin effectively reduced catheter-related venous thrombosis
by 57%. Heparin also significantly decreased the bacterial colonization of the
catheter, and there was a strong reduction in catheter-related bacteremia.
The authors combined all trials using various prophylactic doses of
heparin. Trials using heparin at doses of 3 units/mL in PN, 5000 units every 6
or every 12 hours, or 2500 units of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin
every day decreased the risk of major vessel thrombosis; they concluded that
lower doses may not be
effective.49
HEPARIN-BONDED CATHETERS. A series of 50 pediatric
intensive care unit patients prospectively received either a heparin-bonded (n
= 25) or standard femoral venous catheter (n = 25). Patients were followed
with weekly ultrasonography. Thrombotic complications occurred in 44% of the
standard catheter group vs 8% in the heparin-bonded catheter group.
Positive catheter blood cultures were obtained in 24% of the standard catheter
group vs 0% in the heparin-bonded catheter
group.50
Heparin-bonded catheters are not without complications; their use has been
associated with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies and
thrombocytopenia in
adults.51
 |
Warfarin
|
|---|
Very low doses of warfarin have been shown to be effective in reducing CRT.
Bern et al52
randomized 82 patients with solid tumors to receive or not receive 1 mg of
warfarin beginning 3 days before catheter insertion and continuing for 90
days. The rates of venogram-proven thrombosis were 4 of 42 in the treatment
group vs 15 of 40 in the control group. Unfortunately, warfarin had
to be discontinued in 10% of the patients due to prolongation in the
prothrombin time.52
Yet, low-dose anticoagulant therapy (eg, 1 mg/d of warfarin) is cited as an
evidence-based practice guideline for preventing catheter-related thrombosis
in patients who have
cancer.53 Andrew et
al54 effectively
treated 5 children with warfarin (0.12–0.28 mg/kg/d). These children had
extensive evidence of DVT. Andrew and
coworkers54
achieved an INR of 1.4–1.8. Neither bleeding nor further central venous
line–related DVT occurred subsequently.
We have found absorption rates of oral warfarin to be quite variable in our
short bowel patients, making this group difficult to adequately control on
warfarin. Recent studies of low-dose warfarin do not support its use in
prophylaxis of catheter
occlusion.55
Prophylactic flushes with unfiltered heparin or saline are the standard of
care to maintain CVAD patency but are inadequate to prevent blood-vessel
thrombosis. The benefit of systemic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight
heparin or warfarin has not been well established. Although larger
placebo-controlled studies of low-dose warfarin may be warranted, it might be
more fruitful to use newer factor Xa inhibitors, such as pentasaccharide, or
direct thrombin inhibitors, such as
ximelagatran.55
 |
Conclusions
|
|---|
A proper initial assessment of catheter occlusions is the key to successful
management. The assessment screens are for both thrombotic and nonthrombotic
causes (including mechanical occlusion). Highlights of that assessment and of
the symptoms, treatment, and pediatric dosage guidelines for each type of
occlusion are depicted in Table
III. To help decide the order of agents to infuse into occluded
catheters, a number of algorithms have been published. We have found the 2
most helpful algorithms are from Holcombe et
al40 and from
Jacobs.56
Prevention of occlusion of CVADs is also critical. Specific flushing
guidelines have been discussed in detail in this manuscript. To date, no data
conclusively show heparin flushes to be superior to saline flushes; saline
flushes are less expensive and avoid potential toxicities of heparin flushes,
HIT and loss of bone mineral. No prophylactic regimen, including low-dose
warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin, 1 unit heparin/mL of PN, has been
endorsed by any major medical, nursing, or pharmacy group due to lack of solid
scientific evidence. The most encouraging information on decreasing occlusion
comes from experience with positive-pressure devices that attach to the hub of
most catheter lumens, prevent retrograde blood flow, and consequently decrease
the risk of thrombus formation in the catheter
lumen.4,45
These devices need to be flushed only with saline, which leads to a
significant cost savings as
well.45
The work was supported in part by the Carl and Patricia Dierkes Endowed
Fund for Nutrition and Home Care.
Received for publication April 14, 2005.
Accepted for publication October 3, 2005.
- Stephens LC, Haire WD, Kotulak GD. Are clinical signs accurate
indicators of the cause of central venous catheter occlusion? JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995;19:75
–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Howard L, Ashley C. Management of complications in patients
receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology.2003; 124:1651
–1661.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Moureau N, Poole S, Murdock MA, Gray SM, Semba CP. Central venous
catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2002; 13:1009
–1016.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gorski LA. Central venous access device occlusions, part 1:
thrombotic causes and treatment. Home Healthc Nurse.2003; 21:115
–121.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wise M, Richardson D, Lum P. Catheter tip position: a sign of
things to come. J Vasc Access Devices.2001; 6:18
–26.
- Grant J. Recognition, prevention, and treatment of home total
parenteral nutrition central venous access complications. JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr.2002; 26(suppl):S21
–S28.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- National Institutes of Health, Drug Information Service. Management
of central venous catheter occlusions. Available at:
http://www.cc.nih.gov/phar/updates/99nov-dec.html.
- Gorski LA, Czaplewski LM. Peripherally inserted central catheters.Home Healthc Nurse.2004; 22:758
–773.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Herbst SL, Kaplan LK, McKinnon BT. Vascular access devices:
managing occlusions and related complications in home infusion.Infusion.
1998;4(suppl):S1
–S32.
- Haire WD, Herbst SL. Use of alteplase (t-PA) for the management of
thrombotic catheter dysfunction: guidelines from a consensus conference of the
National Association of Vascular Access Networks (NAVAN). Nutr Clin
Pract. 2000;15:265
–275.[Free Full Text]
- Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, et al. Central vein catheter
thrombosis in intensive care patients: incidence, risk factors, and
relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest.1998; 114:207
–213.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- US Food and Drug Administration Med Watch. Important safety
information letter: dear hospital pharmacy and physician [AstraZeneca, Inc.
website]. Available at:
http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/1999/strept.htm.
- Haire WD, Atkinson JB, Stephens LC. Urokinase versus recombinant
tissue plasminogen activator in thrombosed central venous catheters: a
double-blinded, randomized trial. Thromb Haemost.1994; 71:543
–547. This double-blind, prospective
randomized trial compared the use of a 2 mg dose of alteplase (t-PA) to a
10,000 unit dose of urokinase in 50 dysfunctional catheters radiographically
proven to be occluded by thrombus. After up to 2 treatments, t-PA restored
function in more catheters than urokinase (89% vs 59%; p = .013).
Radiographic contrast injection studies confirmed the complete resolution of
the occlusion in almost twice as many t-PA treated catheters (61%) as
urokinase-treated catheters (32%). Cochrane Library Level: 2
- Ponec D, Irwin D, Haire WD, Hill PA, Li X, McCluskey ER, for the
COOL Investigators. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (Alteplase) for
restoration of flow in occluded central venous access devices: a double-blind
placebo-controlled trial—the Cardiovascular thrombolytic to Open
Occluded Lines (COOL) Efficacy Trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol.2001; 12:951
–955. This trial was a double-blind,
randomized, prospective study comparing alteplase (2 mg/2 ml) to placebo in
149 patients. Function was restored in 74% of catheters treated with a single
dose of alteplase vs 17% for placebo (p < .0001). Cumulative
efficacy after up to 2 doses was 90% with no reported drug-related adverse
events. Cochrane Library Level: 2[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Deitcher SR, Fesen MR, Kiproff PM, et al, for the COOL-2
Investigators. Safety and efficacy of alteplase for restoring function in
occluded central venous catheters: results of the Cardiovascular thrombolytic
to Open Occluded Lines Trial. J Clin Oncol.2001; 20:317
–324.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Semba CP, Deitcher SR, Li X, Resnansky L, Tu T, McCluskey ER, for
the COOL investigators. Treatment of occluded central venous catheters with
alteplase: results in 1,064 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol.2002; 13:1199
–1205.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shen V, Li X, Murdock M, Resnansky L, McCluskey ER, Semba CP, for
the COOL Investigators. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase)
for restoration of function to occluded central venous catheters in pediatric
patients. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.2003; 25:38
–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jacobs BR, Haygood M, Hingl J. Recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator in the treatment of central venous catheter occlusion in children.J Pediatr.
2001;139:593
–596.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fisher AA, Deffenbaugh C, Poole RL, Garcia M, Kerner JA Jr. The use
of alteplase for restoring patency to occluded central venous access devices
in infants and children. J Infus Nurs.2004; 27:171
–174.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Choi M, Massicotte P, Marzinotto V, Chan AKC, Holmes JL, Andrew M.
The use of alteplase to restore patency of central venous lines in pediatric
patients: a cohort study. J Pediatr.2001; 139:152
–156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Chesler L, Feusner JH. Use of tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA)
in young children with cancer and dysfunctional central venous catheters.J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.2002; 24:653
–656.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Svoboda P, Barton P, Barbarash OL, et al. Recombinant urokinase is
safe and effective in restoring patency to occluded central venous access
devices: a multiple-center international trial. Crit Care Med.2004; 32:1990
–1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Haire WD, Deitcher SR, Mullane KM, et al. Recombinant urokinase for
restoration of patency in occluded central venous access devices: a
double-blind placebo controlled trial. Thromb Haemost.2004; 92:575
–582.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Horne MK III. Thrombolytics for occluded catheters. Crit
Care Med. 2004;32:2146
–2147.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Owens LD. Reteplase for clearance of occluded venous catheters.Am J Health Syst Pharm.2002; 59:1638
–1640.[Free Full Text]
- Terrill KR, Lemons RS, Goldsby RE. Safety, dose, and timing of
reteplase in treating occluded central venous catheters in children with
cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.2003; 25:864
–867.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Liu CY, Jain V, Shields AF, Heilbrun LK. Efficacy and safety of
reteplase for central venous catheter occlusion in patients with cancer.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2004; 15:39
–44. This was an open-label, single-arm,
prospective study. Reteplase (0.4 Units) was instilled into cancer patients'
dysfunctional CVADs. Of 139 patients, the first-attempt success rate for
clearing the catheter after a 30-minute dwell time was 66.9%. The cumulative
success rates at 60, 90, and 120 minutes were 88.5%, 94.7%, and 94.7%
respectively. Cochrane Library Level: 3[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pennington CR, Pithie AD. Ethanol lock in the management of
catheter occlusion. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1987; 11:507
–508.[Abstract]
- Pennington CR. Management of catheter occlusion [Letter].JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1990; 14:551
.[Free Full Text]
- Erdman SH, McElwee CL, Kramer JM, Zuppan CW, White JJ, Grill BB.
Central line occlusion with three-in-one nutrition admixtures administered at
home. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr1994; 18:177
–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Werlin SL, Lausten T, Jessen S, et al. Treatment of central venous
catheter occlusions with ethanol and hydrochloric acid. JPEN J Parenter
Enteral Nutr. 1995;19:416
–418. The authors developed a standard
protocol for pediatric patients for the treatment with HCl and EtOH for
urokinase resistant CVAD occlusions. Patency was restored in 34 of 39
catheters using 0.55 mL/kg (up to 3 mL) of 70% EtOH for lipid occlusions and
up to 3 mL of 0.1 N HCl (up to 1 mL in infants between 1 and 3 kg) for mineral
and drug precipitates. Cochrane Library Level: 5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- ter Borg F, Timmer J, de Kam SS, Sauerwein HP. Use of sodium
hydroxide to clear partially occluded vascular access ports. JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993;17:289
–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Garcia MG, Poole RL, Rubin GD, Kerner JA Jr. Successful use of
repeated ethanol injections to clear a central venous catheter occlusion after
urokinase failure. J Pediatr Pharm Pract.1999; 4:152
–156.
- Dannenberg C, Bierbach U, Rothe A, Beer J, Korholz D. Ethanollock
technique in the treatment of bloodstream infection in pediatric oncology
patients with Broviac catheter. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.2003; 25:616
–621.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Metcalf SCL, Chambers ST, Pithie AD. Use of ethanol locks to
prevent recurrent line sepsis. J Infect.2004; 49:20
–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shulman RJ, Reed T, Pitre D, Laine L. Use of hydrochloric acid to
clear obstructed central venous catheters. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1988;12:509
–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Breaux CW Jr, Duke D, Georgeson KE, Mestre JR. Calcium phosphate
crystal occlusion of central venous catheters used for total parenteral
nutrition in infants and children: presentation and treatment. J
Pediatr Surg. 1987;9:829
–832.
- Duffy LF, Kerzner B, Gebus V. Treatment of central venous catheter
occlusions with hydrochloric acid. J Pediatr.1989; 114:1002
–1004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Testerman EJ. Restoring patency of central venous catheters
obstructed by mineral precipitation using hydrochloric acid. J Vasc
Nurs. 1991;1:22
.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Holcombe BJ, Forloines-Lynn S, Garmhausen LW. Restoring patency of
long-term central venous access devices. J Intraven Nurs.1992; 15:36
–41.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Barbaric D, Curtin J, Pearson L, Shaw PJ. Role of hydrochloric acid
in the treatment of central venous catheter infections in children with
cancer. Cancer. 2004;101:1866
–1872.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Reed T, Phillips S. Management of central venous catheter
occlusions and repairs. J Intraven Nurs.1996; 19:289
–294.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Harris JL, Maguire D. Developing a protocol to prevent and treat
central venous catheter occlusions. J Intraven Nurs.1999; 22:194
–198.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion nursing standards of practice.J Intraven Nurs.2000; 23(suppl 6):1
–88.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rummel MA, Donnelly PJ, Fortenbaugh CC. Clinical evaluation of a
positive pressure device to prevent central venous catheter occlusions:
results of a pilot study. Clin J Oncol Nurs.2001; 5:261
–265.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- LeDuc K. Efficacy of normal saline solution versus heparin solution
for maintaining patency of peripheral intravenous catheters in children.J Emerg Nurs.
1997;23:306
–309.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stephens LC, Haire WD, Tarantolo S, et al. Normal saline versus
heparin flush for maintaining central venous catheter patency during apheresis
collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Transfus Sci.1997; 18:187
–193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kamala F, Boo NY, Cheah FC, Birinder K. Randomized controlled trial
of heparin for prevention of blockage of peripherally inserted central
catheters in neonates. Acta Paediatr.2002; 91:1350
–1356.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Randolf AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Andrew M. Benefit of heparin in
central venous and pulmonary artery catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. Chest.1998; 113:165
–171. This study is a very careful
meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials of prophylactic heparin. There was a trend
for heparin to be beneficial in preventing catheter thrombi or fibrin sleeves;
however, this finding did not reach statistical significance. In contrast,
heparin effectively reduced catheter-related venous thrombosis by 57%. Heparin
also significantly decreased the bacterial colonization of the catheter, and
there was a strong reduction in catheter-related bacteremia. Cochrane Library
Level: 1[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Krafte-Jacobs B, Sivit CJ, Mejia R, Pollack MM. Catheter-related
thrombosis in critically ill children: comparison of catheters with and
without heparin bonding. J Pediatr.1995; 126:50
–54.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Laster JL, Nichols WK, Silver D. Thrombocytopenia associated with
heparin-coated catheters in patients with heparin-associated antiplatelet
antibodies. Arch Intern Med.1989; 149:2285
–2287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, et al. Very low doses of warfarin
can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters: a randomized prospective
trial. Ann Intern Med.1990; 112:423
–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Geerts WH, Jeit JA, Clagett GP, et al. Prevention of venous
thromboembolism. Chest.2001; 119(suppl 1):132S
–175S.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Andrew M, Marzinotto V, Pencharz P, et al. A cross-sectional study
of catheter-related thrombosis in children receiving total parenteral
nutrition at home. J Pediatr.1995; 126:358
–363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kuter DJ. Thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in
cancer patients. Oncologist.2004; 9:207
–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jacobs BR. Central venous catheter occlusion and thrombosis.Crit Care Clin.
2003;19:1
–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 30, No. 1 suppl,
S73-S81 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/01486071060300S1S73

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|
|