Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Piggyback Compatibility of Antibiotics with Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition Solutions

Dave Watson, PHARM.D.

Minneapolis Children's Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota

The compatibility of 28 parenteral antibiotics with a pediatric parenteral nutrition solution was tested using a piggyback injection technique. The parenteral nutrition solution, apparatus, and antibiotic doses simulated central venous administration to 5- and 30-kg patients. All antibiotics were injected into a running parenteral nutrition solution, distal to an in-line filter. After passing through a central venous catheter, immersed in a heated water bath, the effluent was collected, analyzed for pH, and visually inspected for precipitate formation. The effluent was not evaluated for the presence of microscopic precipitates. When given as piggyback injections, five of the 28 antibiotics increased the pH of the original parenteral nutrition solution. These were ampicillin, cefamandole, cephalothin, cephradine, and oxacillin. Two of these, ampicillin and cephradine, produced a heavy visible precipitate, found to consist of calcium and phosphorus. The injections of certain antibiotics promote the formation of an insoluble calcium phosphate precipitate. When calcium and phosphate are present in a parenteral nutrition solution, a flush procedure is recommended when injecting antibiotics which increase the pH of the original parenteral nutrition solution. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 9:220-224, 1985)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 9, No. 2, 220-224 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607185009002220


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
A. M. Martins, A. Mcdougal, D. Hamilton, L. Igwemezie, and K. Mcerlane
In Vitro Assessment of Vancomycin HCl Compatibility after Coinfusion with a Specialized Amino Acid Formulation
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, September 1, 1991; 15(5): 536 - 539.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
A. M. Mauer, J. B. Burgess, S. S. Donaldson, K. A. Rickard, V. A. Stallings, J. Van Eys, and M. Winick
Reviews: Special Nutritional Needs of Children with Malignancies: A Review
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1990; 14(3): 315 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
C. G. Schilling, D. M. Watson, H. G. McCoy, and D. L. Uden
Stability and Delivery of Vancomycin Hydrochloride When Admixed in a Total Parenteral Nutrition Solution
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 1989; 13(1): 63 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]