This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Peteet, J. R. Articles by Walsh-Burke, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Peteet, J. R. Articles by Walsh-Burke, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Psychological Aspects of Artificial Feeding in Cancer Patients

Sidney Farber Cancer Institute and the Division of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Cynthia Medeiros, A.C.S.W.

Sidney Farber Cancer Institute and the Division of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Leslie Slavin, B.A.

Sidney Farber Cancer Institute and the Division of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Katherine Walsh-Burke, A.C.S.W.

Sidney Farber Cancer Institute and the Division of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Anorexia and weight loss are major physical and psychological problems for patients with cancer, and nutritional support has become an increasingly important part of cancer treatment. Reports discussing the psychological aspects of parenteral feeding have emphasized the importance of the nature of the underlying illness, but special problems surrounding the use of artificial feeding in patients with cancer have not been described. Patterns of emotional response to artificial feeding in such patients are most directly influenced by two interacting sets of variables: the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer, and personality characteristics of patients and family members involved. Typically, management problems result when demoralized patients respond to artificial feeding by becoming more passive, when independent patients struggle over artificial feeding in order to maintain a sense of control, or when anxious patients or families express fears about dying in the form of extreme preoccupation with eating and maintaining weight. An understanding of these patterns has specific implications for improving the patient's cooperation and quality of life.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 5, No. 2, 138-140 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607181005002138


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Mauer, J. B. Burgess, S. S. Donaldson, K. A. Rickard, V. A. Stallings, J. Van Eys, and M. Winick Reviews: Special Nutritional Needs of Children with Malignancies: A Review JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1990; 14(3): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M.-E. Herrmann, R.-M. Liehr, H. Tanhoefner, and E. O. Riecken Subjective Distress during Continuous Enteral Alimentation: Superiority of Silicone Rubber to Polyurethane JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1989; 13(3): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Dale Gulledge, F. Srp, J. W. Sharp, L. E. Matarese, M. O'Neill, and E. Steiger Invited Review: Psychosocial Issues of Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 1987; 2(5): 183 - 194. [PDF]

				C. Marein, P. Misny, J. Paysinger, M. O'Neill, J. Sharp, F. Srp, A. Dale Gulledge, L. Holpit, L. Matarese, and E. Steiger Invited Review: Home Parenteral Nutrition Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 1986; 1(4): 179 - 192. [PDF]