This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Behara, A. S. Articles by Komanduri, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Behara, A. S. Articles by Komanduri, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Nutrition Support in the Critically Ill: A Physician Survey

From the ¹ Department of Internal Medicine,² Section of Gastroenterology and Nutrition,³ Department of Food and Nutrition,⁴ Department of General Surgery, and⁵ Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Address correspondence to: Srinadh Komanduri, MD, MS, Rush University Medical Center, Section of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 1725 West Harrison Street, #206, Chicago, IL 60612; e-mail: sri_komanduri{at}yahoo.com.

Background: Current clinical practice guidelines delineate optimal nutrition management in the intensive care unit (ICU) patient. In light of these existing data, the authors identify current physician perceptions of nutrition in critical illness, preferences relating to initiation of feeding, and management practices specific to nutrition after initiation of feeding in the ICU patient. Methods: The authors electronically distributed a 12-question survey to attending physicians, fellows, and residents who routinely admit patients to medical and surgical ICUs. Results: On a scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = low, 5 = high), the attending physician's mean rating for importance of nutrition in the ICU was 4.60, the rating for comfort level with the nutrition support at the authors' institution was 3.70, and the rating for the physician's own understanding of nutrition support in critically ill patients was 3.33. Attending physicians, fellows, and residents reported waiting an average of 2.43, 1.79, and 2.63 days, respectively, before addressing nutrition status in an ICU patient. Fifty-two percent of attending physicians chose parenteral nutrition as the preferred route of nutrition support in a patient with necrotizing pancreatitis. If a patient experiences enteral feeding intolerance, physicians most commonly would stop tube feeds. There was no significant difference in responses to any of the survey questions between attending physicians, fellows, and residents. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a substantial discordance in physician perceptions and practice patterns regarding initiation and management of nutrition in ICU patients, indicating an urgent need for nutrition-related education at all levels of training.

Key Words: physician survey • early enteral nutrition • intensive care unit • critical care • necrotizing pancreatitis • parenteral nutrition

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?