Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kudsk, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kudsk, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Original Communications

Enteral Feeding of a Chemically Defined Diet Preserves Pulmonary Immunity but Not Intestinal Immunity: The Role of Lymphotoxin β Receptor

Kenneth A. Kudsk, MD*,{dagger}, F. Enrique Gomez, PhD{dagger}, Woodae Kang, MD, PhD{dagger} and Chikara Ueno, MD{dagger}

From the * Veterans Administration Surgical Services, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin; and the {dagger} Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin–Madison College of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

Correspondence: Kenneth A. Kudsk, MD, 600 Highland Avenue, H4/736 CSC, Madison, WI 53792-7375. Electronic mail may be sent to kudsk{at}surgery.wisc.edu.

Background: Compared with chow or a complex enteral diet (CED), IV administration of a parenteral nutrition solution (IV-PN) impairs intestinal and respiratory mucosal immunity, resulting in cellular and immunoglobulin A (IgA) defects in the intestine and impaired respiratory antiviral and antibacterial defenses. PN given intragastrically (IG-PN) impairs intestinal immunity similar to IV-PN but preserves antiviral defences and partially preserves antibacterial defenses. Lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR) is a molecule essential for development and organization of lymphoid tissue. It controls many molecules important in mucosal immune integrity. This study examines effects of route (IV or enteral) and type (PN, CED, or chow) on murine intestine and lung LTβR expression. Methods: Forty-three mice randomly received IV-PN (n = 12), IG-PN (n = 11), IV saline + chow (chow; n = 11), or a CED (n = 9). After 5 days of feeding, intestinal and lung samples were obtained and processed for levels of LTβR by Western blot. Results: IV-PN significantly reduced intestinal and lung LTβR compared with CED and chow. IG-PN reduced LTβR levels only in the intestine but preserved lung levels. Conclusions: Route and type of nutrition differentially influence molecular events in the intestinal and respiratory mucosal immune systems. Enteral feeding with any diet (complex or chemically defined) maintains lung LTβR expression, whereas intestinal LTβR levels are maintained only with CEDs (chow and CED). We hypothesize that LTβR is responsible for the observed preservation of respiratory tract immunity with administration of a noncomplex, chemically defined enteral diet, whereas intestinal immunity is compromised with this diet.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 31, No. 6, 477-481 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607107031006477


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?