This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McGarr, S. E. Articles by Kirby, D. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McGarr, S. E. Articles by Kirby, D. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Placement in the Overweight and Obese Patient

From the Section of Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia

Correspondence: D. F. Kirby, MD, PO Box 980341, Richmond, VA 23298-0341. Electronic mail may be sent to dfkirby{at}vcu.edu.

Background: Traditionally, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in the obese patient has been considered a relative contraindication due to the impedance of gastric transillumination and inability to approximate the abdominal and gastric wall. The aim of this study was to determine the overall success rate, morbidity, and PEG-related mortality in overweight and obese patients. Methods: Three hundred fifty-five consecutive patients were retrospectively evaluated over a 1-year period at the Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center for postprocedure-related PEG and PEG/jejunostomy (J) complications. One hundred thirty-four patients were considered overweight (body mass index [BMI] 27 kg/m²). Of those, 80 patients were found to be obese (BMI 30 kg/m²) with a BMI ranging 30–63 kg/m². Results: Gastrostomy placement was successful in 130 of 134 (97%) overweight patients (p < .05). The overall procedure-related mortality was 0%. The rate of significant complications in overweight and obese patients remained 0% when compared with those patients with a normal BMI. Out of 355 patients, 14 failed to receive a PEG; 3 of these were obese and 1 was overweight. These 4 procedures were aborted due to a paucity of anatomical landmarks and failure to transilluminate the abdominal wall. Conclusions: We believe that PEG placement in the overweight and obese patient can be a technically safe procedure according to our success rate of 100%, with a procedure-related mortality rate of 0%. In those overweight and obese patients who require specialized long-term enteral nutrition support, PEG placement should be considered earlier and more frequently.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 31, No. 3, 212-216 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607107031003212


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?