This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Street, J. L. Articles by Christensen, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Street, J. L. Articles by Christensen, R. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Implementing Feeding Guidelines for NICU Patients <2000 g Results in Less Variability in Nutrition Outcomes

Jennifer L. Street, RD^*, Dianne Montgomery, NNP^*, Stephen C. Alder, PhD, Diane K. Lambert, RN^*, Dale R. Gerstmann, MD and Robert D. Christensen, MD^*

From ^* Intermountain Healthcare Neonatology Research, McKay-Dee Hospital Center, Ogden, Utah; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, Provo, Utah

Correspondence: Robert D. Christensen, MD, Intermountain Health Care, 4401 Harrison Blvd, Ogden, UT 84403. Electronic mail may be sent to rdchris4{at}ihc.com.

Background: We devised a consistent approach to instituting and advancing enteral nutrition among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients <2000 g birth weight. We then assessed variability in feeding-related outcomes during a period before (period 1) vs after (period 2) implementing these guidelines. Methods: Using data from period 1 vs period 2, we statistically compared the equivalence of variance, focusing on certain feeding-related outcomes. Specific outcomes we chose to examine were (1) day of life when the first enteral feedings were given, (2) number of days during the entire hospitalization when no feedings were given, (3) number of days parenteral nutrition (PN) was administered, and (4) day of life when feedings of 80 mL/k/d and 100 kcal/k/d enteral were achieved. Results: Fifty-eight patients <2000 g were admitted to the NICU in period 1, of which 56 survived to discharge home. In period 2, 68 patients <2000 g were admitted and 66 survived to discharge. Demographic features of the patients in periods 1 and 2 did not differ. In both periods, feedings were begun on a median of day 1. However, in period 1 the range was from day 0 to day 24, and in period 2, the range was from day 0 to day 6 (equivalence of variance p < .001). After feedings were initiated, they were withheld for a median of 2 days (range, 0–23) during the remainder of the hospitalization in period 1 vs a median of 1 day (range, 0–12) in period 2 (p < .001). During period 1, PN was used for a median of 10 days (range, 0–72) vs 7 (range, 0–47) in period 2 (p = .001). During period 1, more variability occurred in the day of life when 80 mL/k/d and 100 kcal/k/d were achieved (both p < .001). No differences were seen in necrotizing enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, mortality, or length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Implementing feeding guidelines was associated with significantly less variability in feeding-related outcomes. We speculate that this is a reflection of better feeding tolerance, which resulted from a more consistent approach to initiating and advancing enteral feedings.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Montgomery, N. Schmutz, V. L. Baer, R. Rogerson, R. Wheeler, A.-M. Rowley, D. K. Lambert, and R. D. Christensen Effects of Instituting the "BEST Program" (Breast Milk Early Saves Trouble) in a Level III NICU J Hum Lact, August 1, 2008; 24(3): 248 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]