This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tepaske, R. Articles by Mathus-Vliegen, E. M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tepaske, R. Articles by Mathus-Vliegen, E. M. H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Diets Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Clinically Relevant Differences in Accuracy of Enteral Nutrition Feeding Pump Systems

Robert Tepaske, MD^*, Jan M. Binnekade, RN, PhD^*,, Peter T. Goedhart, Marcus J. Schultz, MD, PhD^*, Margreeth B. Vroom, MD, PhD^* and Elisabeth M. H. Mathus-Vliegen, MD, PhD

From the Departments of ^* Intensive Care, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Physiology, and Gastroenterology of the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Robert Tepaske, MD, Department of Intensive Care, C3–324, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam ZO, The Netherlands. Electronic mail may be sent to r.tepaske{at}amc.uva.nl.

Background: There are clinically relevant discrepancies between prescribed volumes and delivered volumes of enteral nutrition (EN) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Next to EN-protocol violations due to insufficient care, we hypothesized technical factors to be responsible for this deficit. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of EN feeding pump systems frequently used in the ICU. Methods: Thirteen commercially available EN feeding pumps with their own delivery systems were tested in 12 sessions with different EN feeding tubes and EN formulas in a laboratory setting. The reproducibility of the measurements was determined for the 8 best performing EN feeding pump systems. Results: There were clinically important differences between prescribed volumes and delivered volumes of EN in the tested EN feeding pump systems. The deficit in volume ranged from +66 mL (surplus of 66 mL) to –271 mL (deficit of 271 mL) per 24 hours (14% of prescribed volume). Viscosity of test fluids (water/EN feeding formulas) and resistance of test tubes had no influence on the delivered volume by the tested EN feeding pump systems, because differences between prescribed volumes and delivered volumes were consistently found for each system while varying these test settings. Conclusions: Differences between prescribed and delivered EN volumes are caused by the function and construction of EN feeding pump systems. To improve nutrition therapy, the flow rate has to be adjusted or the best-performing EN feeding pump has to be purchased.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 30, No. 4, 339-343 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607106030004339


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Schultz, P. Spronk, and R. Tepaske Evidence-Based Nutrition Guidelines for Critically Ill Adults JAMA, April 15, 2009; 301(15): 1542 - 1543. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Spronk, J. H. Rommes, and M. A. Kuiper Structural Underfeeding Due to Inaccurate Feeding Pumps? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2007; 31(2): 154 - 154. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Tepaske and M. J. Schultz The authors respond JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2007; 31(2): 154 - 155. [Full Text]