This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bosy-Westphal, A. Articles by Müller, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bosy-Westphal, A. Articles by Müller, M. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Phase Angle From Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: Population Reference Values by Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index

Anja Bosy-Westphal, PhD^*, Sandra Danielzik, PhD^*, Ralf-Peter Dörhöfer, MSc, Wiebke Later, MSc^*, Sonja Wiese, BSc^* and Manfred J. Müller, MD^*

From the ^* Institut für Humanernährung und Lebensmittelkunde, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany; and the Data Input Company, Darmstadt, Germany

Correspondence: Prof. Dr. med. M. J. Müller, Institut für Humanernährung und Lebensmittelkunde, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Düsternbroker Weg 17, D-24105 Kiel, Germany. Electronic mail may be sent to mmueller{at}nutrfoodsc.uni-kiel.de.

Background: The use of bioelectrical impedance phase angle has been recommended as a prognostic tool in the clinical setting, but published reference data bases are discrepant and incomplete (eg, they do not consider body mass index [BMI], and data are lacking for children). Methods: Phase angle reference values stratified by age, sex, and BMI were generated in a large German data base of 15,605 children and adolescents and 214,732 adults, and the determinants of phase angle values were assessed. The reference values were applied to 3 groups of patients and compared with previously published reference values from the United States and Switzerland. Results: Gender and age were the main determinants of phase angle in adults, with men and younger subjects having higher phase angles. In children and adolescents, age and BMI were the main determinants of phase angle. In normal and overweight adults, phase angle increased with increasing BMI, but there was an inverse association at a BMI >40 kg/m². In cirrhosis, the prevalence of a low phase angle increased with the state of disease, whereas it was not different between patients with the metabolic syndrome and controls. There are considerable differences between phase angle reference values from different populations. These differences are not explained by age or BMI and may be due to differences between impedance analyzers. Conclusion: The determinants of phase angle differ between adults and children. In adults, the influence of BMI on phase angle depended on the BMI range. The prognostic value of phase angle may differ in different clinical settings. The use of population-specific and probably impedance-analyzer-specific reference values for phase angle is recommended.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 30, No. 4, 309-316 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607106030004309


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Davis, T. Yavuzsen, D. Khoshknabi, J. Kirkova, D. Walsh, W. Lasheen, R. Lagman, and M. T. Karafa Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle Changes During Hydration and Prognosis in Advanced Cancer American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2009; 26(3): 180 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hengstermann, A. Fischer, E. Steinhagen-Thiessen, and R.-J. Schulz Nutrition Status and Pressure Ulcer: What We Need for Nutrition Screening JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2007; 31(4): 288 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]