Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roorda, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Conroy, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roorda, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Conroy, B. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Techniques, Materials, Devices

Do pH and Temperature Play a Role in Gastrostomy Tube Deterioration?

Andrew K. Roorda, MD, Dean L. Rider, MD, J. Alfred Rider, MD, PhD and Brigitte F. Conroy

From the St. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Correspondence: Andrew K. Roorda, MD, St. Mary's Medical Center, Department of Medical Education, 450 Stanyan Street, San Francisco, CA 94117. Electronic mail may be sent to andrew.roorda{at}chw.edu.

The effects of pH and temperature over time on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube longevity were examined in an in vitro model. Two sets of tubes were obtained from 7 major US PEG manufacturers. Using scissors, each PEG tube was cut cross-sectionally 8 cm from the bumper end of the tube. Both qualitative (photographs) and quantitative (mass) measurements were taken at baseline. Median physiologic gastric acidity was approximated by completely submerging 1 set of each cut PEG tube in a 250-mL glass jar containing a 0.050-N (pH 1.3) solution of hydrochloric acid. As a control, another set of each PEG tube was completely submerged in a 250-mL glass jar containing a buffer solution of pH 6. Each jar was then submerged in the waterbath so that the water completely covered the tube but did not enter the jar. The waterbath was covered and maintained at a constant temperature of 37°C. Measurements taken at baseline were repeated at 168 days and again at 375 days. On qualitative examination, no dilations, brittleness, obstruction, nodularity, tears, loss of elasticity, color changes, tube fracturing, kinking, loss of resilience, or variation in external diameter was observed. Quantitative examination showed no change in mass. Tubes removed from the pH 1.3 solution appeared identical to the tubes removed from the pH 6 solution. In all cases, there were no apparent changes from baseline. These findings suggest that temperature and pH can be excluded as predominant factors in tube deterioration and lend further support to a microbial hypothesis of PEG tube deterioration.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 29, No. 5, 388-391 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607105029005388
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?