|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Optimizing the Benefits and Minimizing the Risks of Enteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill: Role of Small Bowel Feeding
Daren K. Heyland, MD, FRCPC, MSc
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, dkh2{at}post.queensu.ca
John W. Drover, MD, FRCSC
Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Rupinder Dhaliwal, RD
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Jan Greenwood, RD
Critical Care Program, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada
Background: Strategies that maximize the delivery of enteral nutrition while minimizing the associated risks have the potential to improve the outcomes of critically ill patients. By delivering enteral feeds in the small bowel, beyond the pylorus, the frequency of regurgitation and the risk of aspiration is thought to be decreased while at the same time, nutrient delivery is maximized. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review those studies that compare gastric with small bowel feeding. Methods: We searched computerized bibliographic databases, personal files, and relevant reference lists to identify eligible studies. Only randomized, clinical trials of critically ill patients that compared small bowel and gastric feedings were included in this review. In an independent fashion, relevant data on the methodology and outcomes of primary studies were abstracted in duplicate. Results: There were 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. In 1 study, small bowel feeding was associated with a reduction in gastroesophageal regurgitation and a trend toward reduced pulmonary aspiration. Several studies document that small bowel feeding was associated with an increase in protein and calories delivered and a shorter time to target dose of nutrition. Compared with gastric feeding, when the results of 7 randomized trials were aggregated statistically, small bowel feeding was associated with a reduction in pneumonia (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence intervals, 0.59, 0.99). There was no difference in mortality rates between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Small bowel feeding may be associated with a reduction in gastroesophageal regurgitation, an increase in nutrient delivery, a shorter time to achieve desired target nutrition, and a lower rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 26:S51-S57, 2002)
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 26, No. 6 Suppl,
S51-S57 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/014860710202600608
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. M. Ney, J. M. Weiss, A. J. H. Kind, and J. Robbins
Senescent Swallowing: Impact, Strategies, and Interventions
Nutr Clin Pract,
June 1, 2009;
24(3):
395 - 413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. McClave, R. G. Martindale, V. W. Vanek, M. McCarthy, P. Roberts, B. Taylor, J. B. Ochoa, L. Napolitano, G. Cresci, the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors, et al.
Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient:: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.)
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,
May 1, 2009;
33(3):
277 - 316.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G. Masterton, A. Galloway, G. French, M. Street, J. Armstrong, E. Brown, J. Cleverley, P. Dilworth, C. Fry, A. D. Gascoigne, et al.
Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: Report of the Working Party on Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.,
July 1, 2008;
62(1):
5 - 34.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. H. Panagiotakis, J. A. DiSario, K. Hilden, M. Ogara, and J. C. Fang
DPEJ Tube Placement Prevents Aspiration Pneumonia in High-Risk Patients
Nutr Clin Pract,
April 1, 2008;
23(2):
172 - 175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Gray, C. Tynan, L. Reed, J. Hasse, M. Kramlich, S. Roberts, J. Suneson, J. Thompson, and J. Neylon
Bedside Electromagnetic-Guided Feeding Tube Placement: An Improvement Over Traditional Placement Technique?
Nutr Clin Pract,
August 1, 2007;
22(4):
436 - 444.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.-K. Chang, S. A. McClave, C.-B. Hsieh, and Y.-C. Chao
Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) and Gastric Contents Measurement by Refractometry
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,
January 1, 2007;
31(1):
63 - 68.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Farber, J. Moses, and M. Korn
Reducing Costs and Patient Morbidity in the Enterally Fed Intensive Care Unit Patient
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,
January 1, 2005;
29(1_suppl):
S62 - S69.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Phang, W. A. Marsh, T. G. Barlows III, and H. I. Schwartz
Determining Feeding Tube Location by Gastric and Intestinal pH Values
Nutr Clin Pract,
December 1, 2004;
19(6):
640 - 644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Jimenez and J. E. Ramage Jr
Benefits of Postpyloric Enteral Access Placement by a Nutrition Support Dietitian
Nutr Clin Pract,
October 1, 2004;
19(5):
518 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Arabi, S. Haddad, M. Sakkijha, and A. Al Shimemeri
The Impact of Implementing an Enteral Tube Feeding Protocol on Caloric and Protein Delivery in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Nutr Clin Pract,
October 1, 2004;
19(5):
523 - 530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
