This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Minard, G. Articles by Tolley, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Minard, G. Articles by Tolley, E. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Early Versus Delayed Feeding with an Immune-Enhancing Diet in Patients with Severe Head Injuries

Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee, Memphis, gminard{at}utmem.edu

Kenneth A. Kudsk, MD

Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee, Memphis

Sherry Melton, MD

Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee, Memphis

Joseph H. Patton, MD

Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee, Memphis

Elizabeth A. Tolley, PhD

Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, The University of Tennessee, Memphis

Background: Although early enteral feeding clearly reduces septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating trauma, data for head-injured patients are conflicting. This study examines the effects of early us delayed enteral feedings on outcome in patients with severe closed-head injuries with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score greater than 3 and less than 11. Methods: Thirty patients were prospectively randomized to receive an immune-enhancing diet (Impact with fiber) early (initiated < 72 hours after trauma) delivered via an endoscopically placed nasoenteric tube (Stay-Put) or late (administered after gastric ileus resolved). This formula was continued for 14 days or until the patient tolerated oral feeding. Goal rate of nutrition was 21 nonprotein cal/kg/d and 0.3 g N/kg/d. Results: Two patients in the early group were excluded due to inability to place the tube, and one patient in the late group died before 72 hours. Five of the remaining 27 died, 1 in the early group and 4 in the late group. There were no significant differences between the groups in length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) days, significant infection, or GCS score. However, major infection correlated inversely with admission GCS score (R = -0.6, p < .003). Time to reach a GCS score of 14 was significantly longer in patients with significant infections compared with those without (p < .02). Conclusions: No difference in length of stay or infectious complications is shown in patients with severe closed-head injury when they are given early us delayed feeding using an immune-enhancing formula. Severity of the head injury is closely associated with significant infection. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 24:145-149, 2000)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 24, No. 3, 145-149 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607100024003145


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Koretz Enteral Nutrition: A Hard Look at Some Soft Evidence Nutr Clin Pract, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 316 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. McClave, R. G. Martindale, V. W. Vanek, M. McCarthy, P. Roberts, B. Taylor, J. B. Ochoa, L. Napolitano, G. Cresci, the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors, et al. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient:: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 277 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Drover Nutritional Support in the Critically Ill Patient ACCP Crit Care Med Brd Rev, January 1, 2009; 20(0): 403 - 412. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Miller, S. Grossman, E. Hindley, D. MacGarvie, and J. Madill Are Enterally Fed ICU Patients Meeting Clinical Practice Guidelines? Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2008; 23(6): 642 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Koretz Comment on: * Early Enteral Supplementation With Key Pharmaconutrients Improves Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: Outcome of a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2008; 23(4): 447 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Koretz Carts, Horses, and Evidence JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2008; 32(4): 482 - 485. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Hollander and J. I. Mechanick Nutrition Support and the Chronic Critical Illness Syndrome Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2006; 21(6): 587 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Roberts, D. A. Kennerly, D. Keane, and C. George Nutrition Support in the Intensive Care: Unit Adequacy, Timeliness, and Outcomes Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2003; 23(6): 49 - 57. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Heyland, J. W. Drover, R. Dhaliwal, and J. Greenwood Optimizing the Benefits and Minimizing the Risks of Enteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill: Role of Small Bowel Feeding JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 2002; 26(6_suppl): S51 - S57. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. G. Martindale and G. A. Cresci The Use of Immune Enhancing Diet in Head Injury JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2001; 25(2_suppl): S27 - S29. [PDF]