|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial of Nutritional Supplementation After Acute Stroke
Salah E. Gariballa, MRCP
The Hayward Building, Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Stuart G. Parker, MD, MRCP
University Division of Medicine for the Elderly, Leicester General Hospital, United Kingdom
Nick Taub, BA, MSc
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, United Kingdom
C. Mark Castleden, MD, FRCP
University Division of Medicine for the Elderly, Leicester General Hospital, United Kingdom
Background: Although stroke patients who do not have difficulty swallowing may be at risk of undernutrition and worsening nutritional status during hospitalization, optimum methods for nutrition intervention in stroke patients have not been established. Aim: To examine the feasibility of enteral sip feeding as an effective nutrition intervention after acute stroke. Methods: Forty-two acute ischemic stroke inpatients with impaired nutritional status who did not have difficulty swallowing within 1 week after the stroke were entered into a single-blind, randomized, controlled, prospective study of enteral sip feeding. Twenty-one patients were randomized to receive daily oral food supplements for 4 weeks in addition to the hospital food, and 21 patients received only the hospital food for the same period. Main outcome measures were energy and protein intakes during the intervention period, change in nutritional status, disability, infective complications, length of stay, and mortality during hospitalization and at 3 months. Results: Two patients, one from each group, were lost to follow-up immediately after randomization. Twenty patients received oral nutritional supplmentation. The energy intake was significantly greater in the supplemented group: 1807 ± 318 s 1084 ± 343 kcal/d (mean ± SD; p < .0001) (estimated treatment effect, 723 kcal/d; 95% confidence interval [CI], 498 to 947), as was protein intake: 65.1 ± 13.8 vs 44.1 ± 12.8 g/d (p < .001) (estimated treatment effect, 21.0 g/d; 95% CI, 11.7 to 30.3). There also were significant differences between the two groups in the changes in serum albumin and serum iron concentrations between randomization and at follow-up. There was a trend to lower mortality at 3 months in the supplemented group with two deaths (10%) compared with seven deaths (35%) in the control group (p = .127, relative risk, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.07 to 1.21). Conclusions: This study suggests that enteral sip feeding is effective in improving nutritional intake and status in stroke patients who do not have swallowing difficulties. There also may be some beneficial effects on clinical outcome, but larger studies are required to confirm this observation and define more precisely the magnitude of any favorable effects. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 22:315-319, 1998)
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 22, No. 5,
315-319 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607198022005315

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Milne, A. Avenell, and J. Potter
Meta-Analysis: Protein and Energy Supplementation in Older People
Ann Intern Med,
January 3, 2006;
144(1):
37 - 48.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gariballa
Editorial Comment: Protein-Energy Undernutrition and Acute Stroke Outcome
Stroke,
June 1, 2003;
34(6):
1455 - 1456.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
FOOD Trial Collaboration
Poor Nutritional Status on Admission Predicts Poor Outcomes After Stroke: Observational Data From the FOOD Trial
Stroke,
June 1, 2003;
34(6):
1450 - 1456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Potter, M. A. Roberts, J. H. McColl, and J. J. Reilly
Protein Energy Supplements in Unwell Elderly Patients--A Randomized Controlled Trial
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,
November 1, 2001;
25(6):
323 - 329.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Akner and T. Cederholm
Treatment of protein-energy malnutrition in chronic nonmalignant disorders
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
July 1, 2001;
74(1):
6 - 24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|