This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, J. S. Articles by Adrian, T. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thompson, J. S. Articles by Adrian, T. E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Luminal Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Postresection Intestinal Adaptation

Departments of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Eamonn M. Qugley, MD

Depatment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Nebraska Medical Center

J.M. Palmer, PHD

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Physiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska

William W. West, MD

Department of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Thomas E. Adrian, PHD, MRCPATH

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Physiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska

Background: Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) reportedly have a trophic effect on the small intestine. However, it is unclear if this is a local or primarily systemic effect. Loss of the ileocolonic junction (ICJ) may result in increased SCFAs and bacteria in the small intestine from colonic reflux. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of bypass of the ICJ on intestinal SCFA content and postresection adaptation. Methods: Thirty dogs were studied : transection control (TC, n = 10), distal resection of 50% in testine (DR, n = 10), and distal resection with bypass of ICJ (DRBP, n = 10). Animals were killed at 4 and 12 weeks. Luminal SCFAs and bacteria and adaptation of the small intestine were evaluated. Results: Caloric intake was significantly less in the two resected groups (67 ± 3 DR and 63 ± 3, DRBP vs 78 ± 5 kcal/kgl d TC, p < .05). Body weight and albumin levels were decreased at 12 weeks but were similar between the resected groups (81% ± 3% and 74% ± 6% initial and 1.9 ± 0.1 and 2.1 ± 0.2 g/dL, DR and DRBP, respectively). Steatorrhea was present for 12 weeks after resection and was greater after DRBP (14.2% ± 3.8% vs 8.6% ± 1.9% at 4 weeks and 13.6% ± 2.5% vs 6.7% ± 0.6% at 12 weeks, p < .05). Bypassed animals had elevated intraluminal SCFA content (3126 ± 1094 vs 1791 ± 538 DR and 1600 ± 446 µg/mL TC, p < .05) and anaerobic bacterial counts (100% vs 50% and 44%, respectively). Tissue inflammation and myeloperoxidase activity were similar. Small intestinal length (174 ± 10 and 180 ± 10 cm) and circumference (5.2 ± 0.4 and 5.2 ± 0.3 cm) increased to a similar extent in both resected groups at 12 weeks. Thickness of mucosa (1939 ± 162 vs 1662 ± 162 µm) and muscle (865 ± 45 vs 978 ± 79 [µm) layers were similar after DR and DRBP. Conclusion: (1) Bypass of the ICJ after distal resection results in increased growth of anaerobic bacteria and luminal SCFA and is associated with more marked steatorrhea. (2) Bypass of the ICJ does not influence structural adaptation of the small intestine. (3) These findings do not support a local trophic effect for SCFA. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 20:338-343, 1996)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 20, No. 5, 338-343 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607196020005338


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?