Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapadia, S.A.
Right arrow Articles by Silk, D.B.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kapadia, S.A.
Right arrow Articles by Silk, D.B.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Trial

Influence of Three Different Fiber-Supplemented Enteral Diets on Bowel Function and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production

S.A. Kapadia, MRCP

Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital, London

Ana H. Raimundo, PHD

Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital, London

G.K. Grimble, PHD

Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital, London

P. Aimer, BSc

Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital, London

D.B.A. Silk, MD, FRCP

Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital, London

Background: Dietary fiber is known to influence bowel habit and gastrointestinal mucosal cell morphology and function. Large-bowel function is particularly influenced by insoluble, poorly fermentable fiber sources, whereas mucosal function is affected by fiber sources that are soluble and highly fermentable. The aim of the present study was to compare bowel function during consumption of a self-selected diet, a fiber-free enteral diet, and three polymeric enteral diets, each supplemented with a fiber with different fermentation characteristics. The fiber sources used were oat, soy oligosaccharide, and soy polysaccharide. Methods: Seven healthy subjects consumed four diets in random order for 4 to 7 days. These were a self-selected diet, a 2-L polymeric enteral diet, and a 2-L polymeric enteral diet supplemented with 15 g of total dietary fiber per liter derived from either soy oligosaccharide fiber (75 g/L) or oat fiber (15 g/L). An additional six healthy subjects were randomly assigned to three diets (4 to 7 days): a self-selected diet, a 2-L polymeric enteral diet, or the same 2-L polymeric enteral diet supplemented with 20 g of soy polysaccharide fiber per liter (15 g of total dietary fiber per liter). Bowel function was assessed by measuring whole-gut transit time, mean daily stool wet weights, and bowel movement frequency per day. Fermentation characteristics of the different fiber sources were determined quantitatively and qualitatively by measuring short-chain fatty acids produced during in vitro stool culture. Results: Total short-chain fatty acid and butyric acid production with soy oligosaccharide fiber were significantly higher compared with values observed for soy polysaccharide fiber (p < .003), oat fiber (p < .005), and self-selected (control) diet ( p < .003). Compared with the fiber-free diet, consumption of the soy polysaccharide, oat, and soy oligosaccharide-fiber-supplemented enteral diets did not significantly (p > .05) alter whole-gut transit time or stool wet weight. However, bowel frequency was significantly improved by consumption of the soy polysaccharide-fiber-supplemented diet but not the oat fiber or soy oligosaccharide-fiber-supplemented diets. Conclusion: Compared with a fiber-free polymeric enteral diet, the daily consumption of an enteral diet supplemented with 30 g of total dietary fiber per day derived from a poorly fermentable oat fiber, a highly fermentable soy oligosaccharide fiber, or a moderately fermentable soy polysaccharide fiber has little impact, if any, on bowel function. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 19:63-68, 1995)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 19, No. 1, 63-68 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/014860719501900163


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. Whelan, P. A. Judd, V. R. Preedy, R. Simmering, A. Jann, and M. A. Taylor
Fructooligosaccharides and Fiber Partially Prevent the Alterations in Fecal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Concentrations Caused by Standard Enteral Formula in Healthy Humans
J. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 135(8): 1896 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Bouin, G. Savoye, C. Maillot, M.-F. Hellot, C. Guedon, P. Denis, and P. Ducrotte
How do fiber-supplemented formulas affect antroduodenal motility during enteral nutrition? A comparative study between mixed and insoluble fibers
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2000; 72(4): 1040 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]