This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sue, D. Y. Articles by Wolff, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sue, D. Y. Articles by Wolff, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Method for Increasing Confidence in Respiratory Gas Exchange Measurements in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

Craig Wolff, MD

Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

Measurement of O₂ uptake (VO₂) and C0₂ output (VCO₂) with automated instruments can be used to optimize nutritional management of critically ill patients. However, these measurements may be made infrequently because of calibration problems or suspected inaccuracies, especially when the patient is given supplemental oxygen. A simple method is described for periodic testing of automated gas exchange measurements. While a test lung is mechanically ventilated an accurately known mixture of C0₂ and nitrogen is introduced into the inspired gas, simulating VO₂ by dilution and VCO₂ by addition of CO₂. The ratio of VCO₂:VO₂ (respiratory gas exchange ratio, R) in the "expired gas" should be [FGco₂/(1- FGcO₂)] x [(1 - FIO₂)/FIO₂], where FGCO₂ is the fraction of CO₂ in the diluting gas and FIO₂ is the fraction of O₂ in the inspired gas. R is independent of the flow rate of the diluting gas or the rate of ventilation of the test lung. Using a mixing chamber-mass spectrometer, we found that R calculated from measurement of CO₂ and O₂ concentrations in the simulated mixed expired gas closely matched the predicted R for FIO₂ = 0.21 — 0.50. On the other hand, when an automated gas exchange measurement device was tested, R was sometimes excessively high, especially for FIO₂ > 0.35. This method, using a single diluting gas and without precision flowmeters, may be useful for periodic testing of respiratory gas exchange instruments in the intensive care unit. If a discrepancy is found between measured and predicted R, measurements should not be relied upon until further calibration or repairs can be effected. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 15 :625-629, 1991 )

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 15, No. 6, 625-629 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607191015006625


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?