Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McBurney, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, L. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McBurney, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, L. U.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dietary Fiber
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dietary Fiber and Total Enteral Nutrition: Fermentative Assessment of Five Fiber Supplements

Michael I. McBurney, PH.D.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Lilian U. Thompson, PH.D.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Total enteral nutrition (TEN) formulas supplemented with dietary fiber, typically soy polysaccharide, are in widespread clinical use. Five commercially available dietary fiber supplements obtained from fruits (apple, grapefruit, orange, prune, tomato) were examined for potential use in TEN formulas. In uitro fermentations of 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours' duration with human fecal microbiota from three different donors were conducted to assess colonic fermentative effects. Short-chain fatty acid and hydrogen productions differed significantly with fiber source. The most rapid fermentation rate was with tomato followed by orange, grapefruit, apple, and finally prune fiber. Such differences in fermentability should be considered when fiber sources are selected to supplement TEN formulas. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 15:267-270, 1991)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 15, No. 3, 267-270 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607191015003267


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
P. B. Mortensen, M. R. Clausen, H. Bonnen, H. Hove, and K. Holtug
Colonic Fermentation of Ispaghula, Wheat Bran, Glucose, and Albumin to Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Ammonia Evaluated in Vitro in 50 Subjects
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, September 1, 1992; 16(5): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]