Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanarek, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blair, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kanarek, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blair, R. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Premature Babies
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Infusion of Total Parenteral Nutrition via the Umbilical Artery

Keith S. Kanarek, M.B., B.CH., M.P.H.

Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

Margaret B. Kuznicki, M.S.N.

Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

R. Clifford Blair, PH.D., A.G.F.

Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

The administration of total parenteral nutrition through umbilical artery catheters in 48 neonates (birth weight 1.7 ± 0.58 kg) was compared with administration via central venous catheters in 26 infants (birth weight 2.05 ± 0.89 kg). There was no significant difference in the amount of calories delivered (72 ± 12 us 78 ± 18 cal/kg/day) or in the mean daily weight gain (16.6 ± 13.3 vs 18 ± 13.9 g/day). The incidence of sepsis was significantly lower in the umbilical artery catheter group (10.4% us 15.4%) but there was no significant difference in the rate of infection when adjustment was made for number of days of catheter life (1 per 224 days of catheter life in the umbilical artery group us 1 per 199 days in the central venous catheter group). Other major complications included transient hypertension in 2 (4%) of the 48 umbilical artery catheter infants and in 1 (3.8%) of the central venous catheter group, aortic thrombosis in 1 (2%) of the 48 umbilical artery catheter infants and a tricuspid vegetation in 1 (3.8%) of the central venous catheter group. Results suggest that the umbilical artery is a reasonable route for the infusion of total parenteral nutrition in low birth weight infants who require arterial access for blood gas analysis. Use of the umbilical artery catheter for parenteral alimentation may avoid the need for surgical placement of central venous lines and the risk of the attendant complications. Nevertheless, safer routes and improved methods of infusion of parenteral infusion must continue to be developed. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 15:71-74, 1991)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 15, No. 1, 71-74 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/014860719101500171


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?