This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Velasco, N. Articles by Blakemore, W. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Velasco, N. Articles by Blakemore, W. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Total Nitrogen Losses in Hospitalized Patients

Department of Research, The Baptist Medical Centers, Birmingham, Alabama, Escuela de Medicina. Universidad Catolica de Chile, Casilla 114-D Santiago, Chile

Calvin L. Long, PH.D.

Department of Research, The Baptist Medical Centers, Birmingham, Alabama

David A. Otto, PH.D.

Department of Research, The Baptist Medical Centers, Birmingham, Alabama

Nancy Davis, B.S.

Department of Research, The Baptist Medical Centers, Birmingham, Alabama

John W. Geiger, A.B.

Department of Research, The Baptist Medical Centers, Birmingham, Alabama

William S. Blakemore, M.D.

Department of Research, The Baptist Medical Centers, Birmingham, Alabama

Since the measurement of total nitrogen output (TNO) is not routinely determined in the clinical setting, its level is frequently estimated using formulas based on the urinary urea nitrogen excretion (UUN). We measured TNO in 124 surgical patients over 990 days (TNO, 19.22 ± 8.72 g N/ day; total urinary nitrogen (TUN) 18.17 ± 8.70 g N/day; UUN, 15.17 ± 7.70 g N/day; mean gastrointestinal nitrogen (MGIN) 0.68 ± 0.49 g N/day; integumental nitrogen (ITGN), 0.34 ± 0.08 g N/day) and compared the results with the daily estimations using three different formulas: formula A, UUN + 4; formula B, UUN x 1.20 + 1.05, where 1.20 is the reciprocal of the mean ratio UUN/TUN and 1.05 the mean extraurinary nitrogen losses; and formula C, UUN x 1.0986 + 2.55, derived from the regression analysis of UUN us TNO. TNO estimated by these formulas were 19.17 ± 7.70, 19.26 ± 9.24, and 19.22 ± 8.70 g N/day, respectively. The regression analyses of the estimated TNO from the three formulas versus the measured TNO indicated that formulas A, Band C were equally accurate in estimating TNO over the entire range of UUN. However, when only values of UUN 30 g N were considered, a modified formula A (UUN + 6) was the best predictor of TNO. Daily audits of the differences between the estimated and measured TNO showed comparable results for the three formulas. In 28.4 to 31.1 % of the observed days the differences were higher than ± 2 g N/day, an error which is not acceptable when estimating the protein requirements in many clinical conditions. Thus, the formulas for estimating TNO are only clinical approximations of the nitrogen losses. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 14:517-522, 1990)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 14, No. 5, 517-522 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0148607190014005517


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. L. Macias, K. J. Alaka, M. H. Murphy, M. E. Miller, W. R. Clark, and B. A. Mueller Impact of the Nutritional Regimen on Protein Catabolism and Nitrogen Balance in Patients With Acute Renal Failure JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 1996; 20(1): 56 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. Long, K. M. Nelson, D. B. Dirienzo, J. K. Weis, R. D. Stahl, T. D. Broussard, W. L. Theus, J. A. Clark, T. W. Pinson, J. W. Geiger, et al. Glutamine Supplementation of Enteral Nutrition: Impact on Whole Body Protein Kinetics and Glucose Metabolism in Critically Ill Patients JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1995; 19(6): 470 - 476. [Abstract] [PDF]